2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterflow model for agent-based simulation of crowd dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao et al present a simulation of pedestrians' backtrack and the waiting behavior [10]. Heliovaara et al present a model for agents' behavior in counterflow situations [11]. Pouke et al calibrate fluctuations of pedestrian traffic in a random model [12].…”
Section: A Interaction Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al present a simulation of pedestrians' backtrack and the waiting behavior [10]. Heliovaara et al present a model for agents' behavior in counterflow situations [11]. Pouke et al calibrate fluctuations of pedestrian traffic in a random model [12].…”
Section: A Interaction Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4)- (12) describe the displacement of the agents. The rotation of an agent is treated analogously (13) where φ i (t)is the agent's azimuthal angle, is the angular velocity, and is the desired angular velocity. Time τ i is the characteristic one over which the agent alters its current angular velocity to the desired one given by (14) where is the actual facing direction of agent i, is the desired facing direction, and There are various parameters in the agent-movement model.…”
Section: Crowd-movement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These forces are determined by solving Newton's equations of motion, which can be extended to include various types of behaviors such as overtaking [12], counterflow collision avoidance [13], and information exchange [14]. However, the need for complicated expressions (which are relatively hard to calibrate) to calculate these forces imposes a heavy computational burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collision avoidance behaviors were adopted to SFM by adding either a component to the desired velocity (Smith et al, 2009) or a new force to change the pedestrian trajectories (Pelechano et al, 2007). Heliövaara et al (2012) presented a new combined model based on SFM, which alters the desired moving direction of the pedestrian and takes into account both collision avoidance and lane formation. Guo (2014) considered the influence of position factors (between the pedestrian and the entrance/exit boundary) on the counter flow and the lane formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%