1979
DOI: 10.1525/sp.1979.27.1.03a00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for the Evaluation of Neighborhood Viability in Working Class and Low Income Areas in Core Cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has significant implications especially in transient and unstable neighborhoods for determining where neighbors feel safe to travel and where they choose to socially interact with others. The use of cognitive mapping to cope with fear and crime has been noted in several ethnographic and sociological studies (see Schoenberg, 1979). Suttles (1972) found cognitive mapping particularly salient in "defended neighborhoods" which are relatively socially cohesive with distinct boundaries.…”
Section: Cognitive Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has significant implications especially in transient and unstable neighborhoods for determining where neighbors feel safe to travel and where they choose to socially interact with others. The use of cognitive mapping to cope with fear and crime has been noted in several ethnographic and sociological studies (see Schoenberg, 1979). Suttles (1972) found cognitive mapping particularly salient in "defended neighborhoods" which are relatively socially cohesive with distinct boundaries.…”
Section: Cognitive Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…low life expectancy, unemployment, crime, housing conditions and affordability) rather than utilising the quantity/quality of local public services as an important factor in the conceptualisation of, and differentiation between, places. This omission is despite consistent official evidence of significant spatial variations across England in the relative performance of local councils (Audit Commission, 2009), and empirical evidence demonstrating that including the quality of public service provision in neighbourhood classifications shakes up conventional conceptions of 'poor' and 'thriving' localities (Hunter, 2010 (Davies and Herbert, 1993), common sense limits (Morris and Hess, 1975), symbolism (Keller, 1968), social relationships (Downs, 1981), shared public spaces (Schoenberg, 1979), or internally/externally recognised and enforced boundaries (Healey, 1998). Whilst contemporary evidence points to the importance of equality in achieving a more desirable society (e.g.…”
Section: Mccormickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Schoenberg , neighbourhoods are seen as possessing "commonly named boundaries, more than one institution identified with the area, and more than one tie of shared public space or social network" [8]. This place can be acceptable for people to live in safety, it is planned and the increase of the feeling of a community's wellbeing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%