2010
DOI: 10.1177/1362361309347676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Autism Detection in Early Childhood (ADEC) in Mexico

Abstract: A Spanish translation of the Autism Detection in Early Childhood (ADEC-SP) was administered to 115 children aged 15-73 months in Mexico. In Phase 1, children with Autistic Disorder (AD), a non-Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) diagnosis or typical development were assessed with the ADEC-SP by a clinician blind to the child's diagnostic status. In Phase 2, a referred sample of children was assessed with the ADEC-SP, Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised (ADI-R) and Dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
57
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale (ASDS), Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC), Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Gilliam Autism Rating Scale -2nd Edition (GARS-2), Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) -Adolescent Version, and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). Only a paucity of screening measures have been documented to be applicable in the evaluation of bilingual children with disabilities (125), though some exiting instruments have been modified to more accurately assess to cultural differences (126)(127)(128)(129). Despite this, any screening tool, including the M-CHAT, must be scrutinized for reliability when cross-cultural evaluations are being implemented in toddlers.…”
Section: Continued Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Scale (ASDS), Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC), Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Gilliam Autism Rating Scale -2nd Edition (GARS-2), Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) -Adolescent Version, and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ). Only a paucity of screening measures have been documented to be applicable in the evaluation of bilingual children with disabilities (125), though some exiting instruments have been modified to more accurately assess to cultural differences (126)(127)(128)(129). Despite this, any screening tool, including the M-CHAT, must be scrutinized for reliability when cross-cultural evaluations are being implemented in toddlers.…”
Section: Continued Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recent work has demonstrated, trained clinicians can identify autism in very young infants (Hadley et al 2010). With respect to their own child, most parents would agree with the idea that their understanding trumps that of others, and so it is not surprising to observe such early evidence of stoppage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Segundo Stenberg et al (2014) Com relação ao ADEC, foram encontrados cinco estudos que buscam evidências de validade e precisão, indicando que esse instrumento possui propriedades psicométricas adequadas e validade convergente com o M-CHAT (Tabela 4). O ADEC mostrou ser efetivo para detectar os sinais do autismo em crianças entre 12 e 36 meses de idade (Hedley, Young, Angelica, Gallegos, & Marcin Salazar, 2010; Os instrumentos Nível 1 utilizam o formato questionário, com tamanho variando entre nove-63 itens (M = 24; DP = 17), indicando ser esse formato o mais adequado para uso na população geral e que possui os pais ou cuidadores como respondentes. Já entre os instrumentos Nível 2, o formato de questionário não é utilizado, preferindo-se escalas e observação.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified