2016 IX International Conference on Power Drives Systems (ICPDS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icpds.2016.7756682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross impact analysis of Vehicle-to-Grid technologies in the context of 2030

Abstract: This paper investigates the future of Vehicle-to-Grid technologies to be used in the UK in 2030 using the method of cross impact analysis. The paper describes the procedure of the cross impact matrix generation conducted to produce a multiplicity of scenarios of Vehicle-to-Grid futures. Three consistent scenarios (fossil, average and green) have been chosen for further development, interpretation and analysis to predict the implementation of Vehicle-to-Grid technologies for power grid stabilising and balancing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, CIB has gained popularity. Examples of applications in the energy domain include scenarios for the European energy market (Kunz and Vögele, 2017), energy demand in Germany (Vögele et al, 2017) and vehicle-to-grid technology (Knupfer et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Semi-quantitative Cross-impact Balances Scenario Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, CIB has gained popularity. Examples of applications in the energy domain include scenarios for the European energy market (Kunz and Vögele, 2017), energy demand in Germany (Vögele et al, 2017) and vehicle-to-grid technology (Knupfer et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Semi-quantitative Cross-impact Balances Scenario Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schucking et al (2017) maintain that the higher purchases costs of EVs are easier for fleet operations to overcome, stating that the higher annual mileage negates the higher purchase cost due to the lower operating and maintenance costs when compared against conventional vehicles. However, as Knupfer, Sprake, and Vagapov (2016) have acknowledged, the EV is still a niche product, with only expensive and premium manufacturers offering batteries with an acceptable range. On the positive side, Quak, Nesterova, and Von Rooijen (2016) acknowledge that battery leasing or swapping options could be regarded as potential routes to reduce the EV purchase price.…”
Section: Cost Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%