2018
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1529123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crosstalk between TF/FVIIa and EGFR signaling in colorectal cancer cells

Abstract: TF/FVIIa (Tissue Factor/Active Coagulation factor VII) and EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) signaling both promote malignant progression of colorectal cancer. However, the crosstalk of these two signaling pathways in human colorectal cancer cells remains unclear. Here we detected the changes of mRNA profile in human colorectal cancer cell SW620 exposed to FVIIa. Microarray showed that mRNA levels of EGFR ligands were significantly upregulated. Western blot analysis confirmed the upregulation of EGFR lig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 5-FU and GEM have different effects on cell signaling pathways and mechanisms, it is tempting to speculate that the observed differences between these two cell lines after 5-FU exposure are—at least in part—related to the KRAS status, whereas the effect of GEM could be due to different, possibly even post-transcriptional (protein stabilizing) events, which we did not investigate further here. This supports the notion that the crosstalk between TF/FVIIa and EGFR signaling pathways in CRC is dependent on KRAS mutation 35 . Indeed, another recent publication confirmed our hypothesis of a KRAS mutant-driven hypercoagulable state in colorectal cancer cell lines (vs. their Kras wt counterpart) 36 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since 5-FU and GEM have different effects on cell signaling pathways and mechanisms, it is tempting to speculate that the observed differences between these two cell lines after 5-FU exposure are—at least in part—related to the KRAS status, whereas the effect of GEM could be due to different, possibly even post-transcriptional (protein stabilizing) events, which we did not investigate further here. This supports the notion that the crosstalk between TF/FVIIa and EGFR signaling pathways in CRC is dependent on KRAS mutation 35 . Indeed, another recent publication confirmed our hypothesis of a KRAS mutant-driven hypercoagulable state in colorectal cancer cell lines (vs. their Kras wt counterpart) 36 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Tumour-mutated KRAS status is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, according to a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted by Ades 9 . KRAS mutations influence malignancy progression by affecting tissue factor/FVIIa colorectal cancer cells and the EGFR signalling pathway 10 . Compared to KRAS wild-type tumours, KRAS-mutated colorectal cancers have a poorer overall prognosis, a shorter median overall survival, and an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis 9 , 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, activation of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor caused G‐protein αi‐mediated activation of phospho‐tyrosine phosphatase, resulting in dephosphorylated EGF receptor (EGFR) and inhibited EGFR signal transduction through the phosphorylated ERK1/2 or the phosphorylated PI3K/AKT pathway. 22 , 23 , 24 EGFR‐signaling has consistently been found to upregulate tissue factor (TF) in glioma, hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer cells, providing a potential link to the cause of VTE. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 Alternatively, TF can activate the pERK and pAKT pathway and subsequently activate the EGFR pathway, thus creating a positive feedback loop.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven of the 19 identified miRNAs were predicted to regulate the gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor pathway. Interestingly, activation of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor caused G‐protein αi‐mediated activation of phospho‐tyrosine phosphatase, resulting in dephosphorylated EGF receptor (EGFR) and inhibited EGFR signal transduction through the phosphorylated ERK1/2 or the phosphorylated PI3K/AKT pathway 22–24 . EGFR‐signaling has consistently been found to upregulate tissue factor (TF) in glioma, hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer cells, providing a potential link to the cause of VTE 22–25 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation