2017
DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural snapshots: Theory and method

Abstract: Causal influences of culture on cognition are challenging to examine scientifically. We here introduce a method to address this challenge.Cultural snapshots enable scientists to (a) characterize the cultural information commonly and frequently encountered by a collective, (b) examine how such cultural information influences the cognitions of individuals, and (c) draw conclusions about the emergence of shared cognition. Specifically, cultural snapshots are recorded samples of public environments commonly encoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpersonal level is what most clearly distinguishes social psychology from sociology on one side and from experimental psychology on the other; nonetheless, most psychological research on culture either looks at associations between country-level variables (Schwartz, 1986) or links between different constructs at the individual level (Oyserman & Lee, 2008). Only a few research programs have identified interpersonal situations that instill and maintain the group-level tendency in an individual’s behavior, such as Kitayama and colleagues’ work on situational affordances (Kitayama et al, 1997; Morling et al, 2002) and Weisbuch and colleagues’ work on nonverbal cues (Weisbuch, Lamer, Treinen, & Pauker, 2017). Our research documents another: experiencing interactions and evaluative feedback reinforces norm-compliant behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpersonal level is what most clearly distinguishes social psychology from sociology on one side and from experimental psychology on the other; nonetheless, most psychological research on culture either looks at associations between country-level variables (Schwartz, 1986) or links between different constructs at the individual level (Oyserman & Lee, 2008). Only a few research programs have identified interpersonal situations that instill and maintain the group-level tendency in an individual’s behavior, such as Kitayama and colleagues’ work on situational affordances (Kitayama et al, 1997; Morling et al, 2002) and Weisbuch and colleagues’ work on nonverbal cues (Weisbuch, Lamer, Treinen, & Pauker, 2017). Our research documents another: experiencing interactions and evaluative feedback reinforces norm-compliant behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BWC footage can serve as a “cultural snapshot” (Weisbuch et al, 2009, 2017) for police-citizen interactions: to reveal patterns in citizen interactions (as data), their relation to perceiver-level factors in their interpretation (as stimuli), and their causal effects on institutional trust (as treatment). Sampling thin slices from traffic stops, we not only extend research on the content of officers’ communication with the public (Voigt et al, 2017), but also probe how participants’ own beliefs correspond to their perceptions of these cues, and demonstrate their consequences for police-community relations.…”
Section: Body Camera Footage As Data Stimuli and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following established methodology (Pauker et al, 2019; Weisbuch & Ambady, 2009; Weisbuch et al, 2009, 2016, 2017), we selected (a) a broad sample of popular shows on different TV networks with the highest viewership totals in the U.S., (b) clips from episodes that actually aired during the time period of interest, (c) characters within each show that were matched on appearance frequency, race, and age, and (d) multiple snapshots of each character. Clips were sampled in accordance with a priori rules (see below), and steps b–d were performed by hypothesis-blind experimenters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture can then be understood as the private and public representations common to a collective group (Sperber, 1996). We follow Adams and Markus’s (2004) extension of this framework and for this article, define cultural patterns as specifiable public representations commonly encountered by a collective (see also Weisbuch et al, 2017). We argue that children learn intersubjective norms in part by perceiving cultural patterns, so what they learn reflects the public representations common to their local ecologies.…”
Section: Intersubjective Norms and Nonverbal Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%