2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/210350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Status for Gastrointestinal Nematode Diagnosis in Small Ruminants: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Abstract: Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) parasites pose a significant economic burden particularly in small ruminant production systems. Anthelmintic resistance is a serious concern to the effective control of GIN parasites and has fuelled the focus to design and promote sustainable control of practices of parasite control. Many facets of sustainable GIN parasite control programs rely on the ability to diagnose infection both qualitatively and quantitatively. Diagnostics are required to determine anthelmintic efficacie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
18
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Infeksi cacing nematoda gastrointestinal merupakan masalah penting dalam usaha peternakan karena dapat menghambat pertumbuhan, gangguan reproduksi, penurunan produksi, anoreksia, diare, anemia atau bahkan kematian ternak (Entrocasso et al, 2008;Sutherland and Leathwick, 2011;Roepstorff et al, 2011;Charlier et al, 2018). Cacing nematoda gastrointestinal yang banyak menginfeksi ruminansia adalah Trichostrongylus spp, Strongyloides, Haemonchus spp, Nematodirus dan Cooperia spp (Houdijk and Athanasiadou, 2003;Preston et al, 2014;Belina et al, 2017;Islam et al, 2017). Penggunaan anthelmintik spektrum luas seperti golongan benzimidazole, imidothiazole dan golongan macrocyclic lactones telah menjadi andalan dalam pengendalian infeksi cacing nematoda gastrointestinal dalam usaha peternakan selama hampir 40 tahun yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan resistensi cacing terhadap anthelmintik (Sargison et al, 2001;Kaplan and Vidyashankar, 2012;Geurden et al, 2015).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Infeksi cacing nematoda gastrointestinal merupakan masalah penting dalam usaha peternakan karena dapat menghambat pertumbuhan, gangguan reproduksi, penurunan produksi, anoreksia, diare, anemia atau bahkan kematian ternak (Entrocasso et al, 2008;Sutherland and Leathwick, 2011;Roepstorff et al, 2011;Charlier et al, 2018). Cacing nematoda gastrointestinal yang banyak menginfeksi ruminansia adalah Trichostrongylus spp, Strongyloides, Haemonchus spp, Nematodirus dan Cooperia spp (Houdijk and Athanasiadou, 2003;Preston et al, 2014;Belina et al, 2017;Islam et al, 2017). Penggunaan anthelmintik spektrum luas seperti golongan benzimidazole, imidothiazole dan golongan macrocyclic lactones telah menjadi andalan dalam pengendalian infeksi cacing nematoda gastrointestinal dalam usaha peternakan selama hampir 40 tahun yang pada akhirnya menimbulkan resistensi cacing terhadap anthelmintik (Sargison et al, 2001;Kaplan and Vidyashankar, 2012;Geurden et al, 2015).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…This method is also often required to demonstrate anthelmintic e cacy for the registration of new control products, but the loss of life makes it an impractical method for use on farms (11). Faecal worm egg count (FWEC) is the method currently recommended for GIN monitoring by the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology and is used by many sheep producers (12,13). The most commonly used FWEC technique, the McMaster method, is known to have relatively low analytical sensitivity of 10-50 eggs per gram of faeces (epg) and high variability between subsamples (14)(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is also often required to demonstrate anthelmintic e cacy for the registration of new control products, but the need to euthanase sheep makes it an impractical method for use on farms [11]. Faecal worm egg count (FWEC) is the method currently recommended for GIN monitoring by the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology and is used by many sheep producers [12,13]. The most commonly used FWEC technique, the McMaster method, is known to have relatively low analytical sensitivity of 10-50 eggs per gram of faeces (epg) and high variability between subsamples [14,15,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%