2016
DOI: 10.5958/2394-6792.2016.00062.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytolo-histological correlation of breast lump-as a part of internal quality control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Dr manju et al [9] . ; Shanmugasamy K et al [10] were quite comparable to the findings of our studies. In the present study, False positive results were very minimal compared to False negative results.False negative and inconclusive reports were commonly resulted from hemorrhagic aspirates from highly vascular tumors , acellular aspirates from very hard lumps, and aspirates from cystic lumps and sampling error.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of Dr manju et al [9] . ; Shanmugasamy K et al [10] were quite comparable to the findings of our studies. In the present study, False positive results were very minimal compared to False negative results.False negative and inconclusive reports were commonly resulted from hemorrhagic aspirates from highly vascular tumors , acellular aspirates from very hard lumps, and aspirates from cystic lumps and sampling error.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Studies done byPuja B. Jarwani et al 8 and Ambedkar Raj, KulandaiVelu et al 9 , showed that breast FNAC had a sensitivity ranging from 82% to 97.5% and specificity of more than 99%, which is comparable to our study. Study done by Shanmugasamy K et al 10 showed that the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of breast FNAC in diagnosis of malignancy was 93.5%,100%and 98.3% respectively. Zhang Qin et al in their study reported a sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 97.3% respectively for FNAC in diagnosing breast lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%