2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark injection transient spectroscopy and density of states in amorphous organics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One electrode must be injecting majority charge carriers and the other electrode blocking minority charge car rier injection. For the ideal SCLC case, several assumptions are made [1,9,13,14]: (i) the charge injection is efficient, meaning that the injecting contact has a neglectable injection resistance; (ii) the serial resistance of, for example, contact metalization and cables has to be low in comparison to the sample resist ance; (iii) the blocking contact is efficient and thus, the device is assumed to be unipolar; (iv) the difference of the electrode work functions is zero, resulting in no build in field and in a symmetric device; (v) the trapping of charge carriers, doping and a field dependency of the mobility are neglected.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One electrode must be injecting majority charge carriers and the other electrode blocking minority charge car rier injection. For the ideal SCLC case, several assumptions are made [1,9,13,14]: (i) the charge injection is efficient, meaning that the injecting contact has a neglectable injection resistance; (ii) the serial resistance of, for example, contact metalization and cables has to be low in comparison to the sample resist ance; (iii) the blocking contact is efficient and thus, the device is assumed to be unipolar; (iv) the difference of the electrode work functions is zero, resulting in no build in field and in a symmetric device; (v) the trapping of charge carriers, doping and a field dependency of the mobility are neglected.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For confirma tion of determined mobility values, the comparison to tran sient SCLC measurements at the same sample is reasonable and results in a selfconsistent measurement method. This allows for a more accurate evaluation of the mobility and at the same time gives information about the occurring nonide alities like trap occurrence, injection barriers and amount of minority charge carriers [6][7][8][9]. Hereby, the transient SCLC method is more precise concerning the determination of the mobility from a pronounced current peak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] However, to date, transient electric methods, used to directly measure carrier separation, only provide results slower than 10 ns. [8][9][10] Among these methods, transient current tools (e.g., time of flight, 11,12 charge extraction, 12 and dark injection 13 ) are barely useful in the study of such rapid processes, limited by the RC constant of the external circuit (typically ∼100 ns). By contrast, the transient photovoltage (TPV), which originates from the spatial separation of electrons and holes and works under quasi-open circuit condition, is independent of the external circuit, allowing for the measurement of rapid a) Email: xiaoqingchen@fudan.edu.cn processes (e.g., interface dissociation of excitons in organic semiconductors 14 ) without the limitation of the RC constant of the external circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%