The neutral Rh(I)–Xantphos
complex [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)Cl]
n
, 4, and cationic Rh(III) [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)(H)2][BArF
4], 2a, and [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos-3,5-C6H3(CF3)2)(H)2][BArF
4], 2b, are described [ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3; Xantphos
= 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthene; Xantphos-3,5-C6H3(CF3)2 = 9,9-dimethylxanthene-4,5-bis(bis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)phosphine].
A solid-state structure of 2b isolated from C6H5Cl solution shows a κ1-chlorobenzene
adduct, [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos-3,5-C6H3(CF3)2)(H)2(κ1-ClC6H5)][BArF
4], 3. Addition of H2 to 4 affords,
crystallographically characterized, [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)(H)2Cl], 5. Addition of diphenyl
acetylene to 2a results in the formation of the C–H
activated metallacyclopentadiene [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)(ClCH2Cl)(σ,σ-(C6H4)C(H)CPh)][BArF
4], 7, a rare example of a crystallographically characterized Rh–dichloromethane
complex, alongside the Rh(I) complex mer-[Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)(η2-PhCCPh)][BArF
4], 6. Halide abstraction from [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)Cl]
n
in the presence of diphenylacetylene affords 6 as the
only product, which in the solid state shows that the alkyne binds
perpendicular to the κ3-POP Xantphos ligand plane.
This complex acts as a latent source of the [Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)]+ fragment and facilitates
ortho-directed C–S activation in a number
of 2-arylsulfides to give mer-[Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)(σ,κ1-Ar)(SMe)][BArF
4] (Ar = C6H4COMe, 8; C6H4(CO)OMe, 9; C6H4NO2, 10; C6H4CNCH2CH2O, 11; C6H4C5H4N, 12).
Similar C–S bond cleavage is observed with allyl sulfide,
to give fac-[Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)(η3-C3H5)(SPh)][BArF
4], 13. These products of C–S
activation have been crystallographically characterized. For 8 in situ monitoring of the reaction by NMR spectroscopy reveals
the initial formation of fac-κ3-8, which then proceeds to isomerize to the mer-isomer. With the para-ketone aryl sulfide, 4-SMeC 6H4COMe, C–H activation ortho to the ketone occurs to give mer-[Rh(κ3-P,O,P-Xantphos)(σ,κ1-4-(COMe)C6H3SMe)(H)][BArF
4], 14. The temporal evolution of carbothiolation catalysis using mer-κ3-8, and phenyl acetylene
and 2-(methylthio)acetophenone substrates shows initial fast catalysis
and then a considerably slower evolution of the product. We suggest
that the initially formed fac-isomer of the C–S
activation product is considerably more active than the mer-isomer (i.e., mer-8), the latter of
which is formed rapidly by isomerization, and this accounts for the
observed difference in rates. A likely mechanism is proposed based
upon these data.