Micro Total Analysis Systems 2001 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1015-3_85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Fabrication of Multiple Nanofluidic Interconnects for Three-Dimensional Microanalytical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While similarly designed crossed microfluidic arrays were recently demonstrated by Whitesides and co-workers, 41 these used passive diffusion through the pores of the polycarbonate membrane to mix the fluids, as opposed to the electrically driven flow demonstrated here. [42][43][44] A significant advantage of using electrically driven flow, by choosing the pore diameter, pore surface chemistry, channel surface charge, and solution ionic strength, one can select the direction that fluid flows through the pore for the same externally applied voltage. Interestingly, in the microfluidic-nanofluidic hybrid architecture, the flow is opposite to the direction based on the electroosmotic flow characteristics of the 200-nm pore diameter PCTE capillary array alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While similarly designed crossed microfluidic arrays were recently demonstrated by Whitesides and co-workers, 41 these used passive diffusion through the pores of the polycarbonate membrane to mix the fluids, as opposed to the electrically driven flow demonstrated here. [42][43][44] A significant advantage of using electrically driven flow, by choosing the pore diameter, pore surface chemistry, channel surface charge, and solution ionic strength, one can select the direction that fluid flows through the pore for the same externally applied voltage. Interestingly, in the microfluidic-nanofluidic hybrid architecture, the flow is opposite to the direction based on the electroosmotic flow characteristics of the 200-nm pore diameter PCTE capillary array alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure b demonstrates the insensitivity to analyte charge state by comparing the transfer of the neutral fluorophore bodipy. While similarly designed crossed microfluidic arrays were recently demonstrated by Whitesides and co-workers, these used passive diffusion through the pores of the polycarbonate membrane to mix the fluids, as opposed to the electrically driven flow demonstrated here.
2 Photograph of a separation/collection microchip showing the crossed microchannels and the nanofluidic capillary array membrane.
3 Fluorescence intensity (left ordinate, solid line) and applied bias, Δ V , (right ordinate, dashed line) as a function of time showing transport of 0.17 μM fluorescein in 5 mM pH 8 phosphate buffer (PB) across a 200-nm pore diameter PCTE membrane. The schematics below the respective graphs show the bias voltage application schemes.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating the DNAzyme into a microfluidic device offers a convenient package and the ability to include capillary ion analysis on selected analyte bands prior to the Pb determination for greatly improved selectivity. We expect that the combination of immobilized DNAzyme inside the nanopores of a hybrid nanofluidic/microfluidic device will offer a convenient method of accomplishing this. Although all of the experiments discussed here were performed on planar Au, there is every reason to believe the molecular beacon chemistry can be ported to other Au-coated surfaces, such as the electrolessly deposited Au on the interior of nanocapillaries, to yield a flow-through device compatible with a preseparation. Since the rate-limiting step is diffusion to and away from the Au surface, incorporation into a flow-through device is expected to improve reaction times dramatically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport through pores is affected by steric hindrance or exclusion due to molecular entropy, hydrodynamic hindrance, caused by viscous forces associated with the walls of the pores, and charge interactions between the molecule and the surface of the nanopore or nanochannel. Three-dimensional systems using nanofluidic interconnects, which provide fluidic communication among microfluidic channels in vertically separated layers, have been of interest for the purpose of fluid handling in mass-transported limited samples [57,58]. Pore/channel size, surface chemistry (i.e., charge), applied potentials and multistep filtrations with different membranes can be used to perform highly efficient separations [2,12].…”
Section: Sieving or Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%