The 2004 47th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2004. MWSCAS '04.
DOI: 10.1109/mwscas.2004.1354364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design review and innovations in low-voltage differential signaling drivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the low transconductance, large parasitic element and limited cut-off frequency of CMOS, LVDS interface designs with high performance in standard CMOS process were reported in Refs. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], but further increase in bandwidth and reduction in power and die area are desired for high data transmission rate and I/O density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the low transconductance, large parasitic element and limited cut-off frequency of CMOS, LVDS interface designs with high performance in standard CMOS process were reported in Refs. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], but further increase in bandwidth and reduction in power and die area are desired for high data transmission rate and I/O density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them, however, require accurate current biasing. To generate such current, a band-gap reference and an external resistor is mostly used [3,6,8,9]. Some proposed solutions do not describe biasing circuit [4,7].…”
Section: General Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%