2001
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.17.527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Beryllium and Selenium in Human Urine and of Selenium in Human Serum by Graphite-Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the complexity of serum and blood matrices, no signal suppression was noticed following our optimal conditions and our beryllium detection limits (2 to 7 ng L -1 ) using the Varian AA280Z Zeeman atomic absorption spectrometer are among the lowest reported to date. [ 40 ] and [ 26 ], reported a detection limit of 370 ng L -1 and 4.3 ng L -1 respectively for beryllium in urine by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. In a similar work, [ 27 ], and [ 24 ], reported a detection limit of 50 ng L -1 for beryllium in urine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the complexity of serum and blood matrices, no signal suppression was noticed following our optimal conditions and our beryllium detection limits (2 to 7 ng L -1 ) using the Varian AA280Z Zeeman atomic absorption spectrometer are among the lowest reported to date. [ 40 ] and [ 26 ], reported a detection limit of 370 ng L -1 and 4.3 ng L -1 respectively for beryllium in urine by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. In a similar work, [ 27 ], and [ 24 ], reported a detection limit of 50 ng L -1 for beryllium in urine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage of using ICP-MS to de-tect and quantify liver Se is the potential for occurrences of interferences through mass overlap. These can include formation of doubly charged ions ( 78 Ge ϩϩ interferes with 78 Se), interferences from elements with the same isotopic mass ( 74 Ge will interfere with 74 Se), and formation of polyatomic ions derived from argonbased plasma, especially for elements with m/z less then 80. Selenium detection can suffer from polyatomic interference from an argon dimer ( 40 Ar 40 Ar ϩ ) that has the same mass as the most abundant Se isotope ( 80 Se ϭ 49.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 In brief, these include the need for a large sample size for HG-AAS and FL, the requirement for destruction of organic matter before analysis with use of concentrated acids for GC-ECD, FL, HG-AAS, and ICP-AES, 2,5 the need for sample derivatization for GC-ECD and FL, 57,63 the need for oxidizing conditions to prevent volatilization of Se in ETAAS, 48 and the need to use a matrix modifier for ETAAS and GFAAS. 14,41,42,74 Available reports have shown that HG-AAS is 1 of the most widely used methods for Se detection in biological samples. This method allows minimum matrix interferences because of selective separation of Se from the matrix by generation of volatile covalent hydrides, although all the Se has to be converted to a form that will result in hydride formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years numerous analytical techniques have been employed to detect Be(II) in different samples. These include spectrophotometric methods [4][5][6][7], spectrofluorimetric methods [8,9], flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) [10], electrothermal atomic absorption spectroscopy (ET-AAS) [11][12][13], inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) [14] and several other techniques [15][16][17][18]. In contrast to the majority of these *Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%