2002
DOI: 10.1002/cb.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining linkages between consumer choices in a social context and the consumer's values: a means–end approach

Abstract: This paper presents a conceptual model of means-end theory. The proposed model, built on Gutman's (1982) contributions to means-end theory, consists of four conceptual categories that are linked together. The conceptual categories are context-nested consumer choices, attributes of the consumer choices, consequences and values. The discussion uses results of four cases to illustrate the conceptual categories of the proposed explanatory means-end model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The means-end approach is based on two premises (Manyiwa and Crawford, 2002) . The means-end chain approach also parallels the expectancy-value theory (Rosenberg, 1956), which proposes that consumer actions have consequences and that consumers learn to relate certain consequences to certain product attributes (Reynolds and Gutman, 1988).…”
Section: Desire Expectations 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The means-end approach is based on two premises (Manyiwa and Crawford, 2002) . The means-end chain approach also parallels the expectancy-value theory (Rosenberg, 1956), which proposes that consumer actions have consequences and that consumers learn to relate certain consequences to certain product attributes (Reynolds and Gutman, 1988).…”
Section: Desire Expectations 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, consequences (mid level of abstraction) are more relevant to the self than attributes (low level of abstraction) and values (high level of abstraction) are more relevant to the self than personal consequences (Olson and Reynolds, 1983). In this way, there is a movement at increasingly higher levels of abstraction to desired ends, reflecting progress from the product to aspects of the consumer's self concept (Gutman, 1997).The means-end approach is based on two premises (Manyiwa and Crawford, 2002) . The means-end chain approach also parallels the expectancy-value theory (Rosenberg, 1956), which proposes that consumer actions have consequences and that consumers learn to relate certain consequences to certain product attributes (Reynolds and Gutman, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The means-end approach relies on two premises (Manyiwa and Crawford 2002): values have a significant impact on (buying) behaviour, and consumers classify products and services into sets to make the choice-making process easier. The means-end approach has its roots in Kelly's Personal Construct Psychology (1991/1955.…”
Section: ; Reynolds and Rochon 2001)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research might try to develop these criteria. Manyiwa and Crawford (2002) point out that advocates of the means-end approach frequently assume that by merely linking attributes to consequences to values, "the link between consumers' values and behaviour (choice) has been established" (p.56) as well.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma escada completa é um encadeamento de ligações feitas a partir de uma resposta inicial, juntando atributos, conseqüências e valores (MANYIWA; CRAWFORD, 2001).…”
Section: A Técnica Da Escalada (Laddering)unclassified