2013
DOI: 10.1108/09653561311325307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing an approach to assess the influence of integrating disaster risk reduction practices into infrastructure reconstruction on socio‐economic development

Abstract: Purpose -Disasters provide physical, social, economic, political and environmental development windows of opportunity particularly through housing and infrastructure reconstruction. The reconstruction process should not be neglected due to the opportunistic nature of facilitating innovation in development. In this respect, postdisaster 'infrastructure' reconstruction plays a critical role in development discourse and is often essential to sustain recovery after major disasters. However, reconstruction followin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best method to assess the influence of integrated disaster mitigation strategies is through evaluation of current disaster mitigation strategy's impact on mitigating the various factors that constitute an existing vulnerability. Afterwards, the strategy's influence is measured when we could overcome the factors that constitute such vulnerability in achieving socio-economic development performance target (Palliyaguru et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best method to assess the influence of integrated disaster mitigation strategies is through evaluation of current disaster mitigation strategy's impact on mitigating the various factors that constitute an existing vulnerability. Afterwards, the strategy's influence is measured when we could overcome the factors that constitute such vulnerability in achieving socio-economic development performance target (Palliyaguru et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the impacts of hurricanes Katrina (see Oh et al, 2010aOh et al, , 2013Grigg, 2012;Grubesic and Matisziw, 2013;Urlainins et al, 2014;Pescaroli and Kelman, 2017;Cutter, 2016) and Sandy (see Kelman et al, 2014;Pescaroli and Alexander, 2016) have been assessed in a number of scientific publications. Economic impacts make for the predominant emphasis in such assessments (e.g., Oh et al, 2010b;Chopra and Khanna, 2015;Pant et al, 2016;Critical 5, 2015) as, for example, in the case of the Fukushima event in 2011 (UNISDR, 2017;Urlainis et al, 2014;Pescaroli and Kelman, 2017). Another emphasis is put on the need for improved preparedness in these countries (e.g., Kaneberg et al, 2016).…”
Section: Thematic Foci and Context Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perlu sosialisasi berkelanjutan kepada lembaga maupun masyarakat untuk memahami bencana. Bencana didefinisikan sebagai peristiwa atau serangkaian peristiwa yang menimbulkan kehancuran, kematian, cedera fisik, penderitaan manusia, kerugian materiel maupun nonmateriel, dan sejenisnya (Braga et al, 2008;Cohen & Werker, 2008;Palliyaguru et al, 2013). Senada dengan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 mendefinisikan bencana sebagai peristiwa atau rangkaian peristiwa yang mengancam dan mengganggu kehidupan dan penghidupan masyarakat yang disebabkan, baik oleh faktor alam dan/atau faktor nonalam maupun faktor manusia sehingga mengakibatkan timbulnya korban jiwa manusia, kerusakan lingkungan, kerugian harta benda, dan dampak psikologis.…”
unclassified