2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an achiral supercritical fluid chromatography method with ultraviolet absorbance and mass spectrometric detection for impurity profiling of drug candidates. Part II. Selection of an orthogonal set of stationary phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure the authenticity of the materials utilized within this study, the 31 synthesized samples were structurally characterized by 1 H-NMR, 13 C{ 1 H}-NMR, GC-MS and ATR-FTIR and the purity of all samples was confirmed to be >99.5% (by NMR) in all cases. Selectivity in SFC can be controlled by changing the mobile phase composition, temperature and pressure [23][24][25], however, the stationary phase was reported to be the most influential parameter in affecting chromatographic selectivity [26][27][28]. Hence, a generic gradient SFC condition that is typically used in screening activities was employed [26,27,29] to assess the chromatographic retention and separation of 1 -31 on a range of disparate SFC stationary phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the authenticity of the materials utilized within this study, the 31 synthesized samples were structurally characterized by 1 H-NMR, 13 C{ 1 H}-NMR, GC-MS and ATR-FTIR and the purity of all samples was confirmed to be >99.5% (by NMR) in all cases. Selectivity in SFC can be controlled by changing the mobile phase composition, temperature and pressure [23][24][25], however, the stationary phase was reported to be the most influential parameter in affecting chromatographic selectivity [26][27][28]. Hence, a generic gradient SFC condition that is typically used in screening activities was employed [26,27,29] to assess the chromatographic retention and separation of 1 -31 on a range of disparate SFC stationary phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation might be changes in column selectivity due to a divergent surface silanol activity, e.g. caused by polar endcapping . The addition of diethylamine as well as 50% of acetonitrile in methanol was advantageous because the resolution of 4 and 5 could be significantly improved (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed earlier, even under SFC conditions, SPP columns exhibit increased separation power over TPP, producing faster separations with higher efficiencies. Some applications were published, including drug discovery (Lemasson et al, 2015;West et al, 2018) and metabolomics (Desfontaine et al, 2018).…”
Section: Spp For Achiral Separations In Sfcmentioning
confidence: 99%