2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of privacy-preserving sensor for person detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is hard to identify the differences between regular cameras and privacy preservation cameras. Nakashima et al [ 10 ] developed a privacy preservation sensor for person detection to identify the person’s state and position without capturing and images.…”
Section: Cmos Image Sensor Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hard to identify the differences between regular cameras and privacy preservation cameras. Nakashima et al [ 10 ] developed a privacy preservation sensor for person detection to identify the person’s state and position without capturing and images.…”
Section: Cmos Image Sensor Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] proposed a system using thermal motion sensors that enables two-person motion tracking in a room. [45] used a line sensor and cylindrical lens to detect a person's position and movement. [53] controlled the light-transport to shadow sensitive regions, removing data-utility in those areas.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(II). Finding the k − 1 neighbors and 2D translation/scaling alignment, between the target face and the k − 1 displayed faces, is achieved using the two line sensors with cylindrical lenses, which have been shown to be privacy preserving [45]. The scale and position of the target face is found by identifying local extrema of the intensity profiles as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Optical K-anonymitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Nakashima et al, 2010). Na pesquisa de (Sixsmith;Johnson, 2004), que acompanhou 28 pessoas com idades entre 65 e 82 anos, a maioria dos participantes preferiu imagens térmicas do que imagens de câmeras RGB com relação à preservação da privacidade.…”
Section: Privacidadeunclassified