2020
DOI: 10.1037/men0000215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, variance composition, measurement invariance across five gender identity groups, and validity of the Health Behavior Inventory–Short Form.

Abstract: The current study extended previous work on the Health Behavior Inventory-20, a multidimensional measure of health risk and promotion behaviors, in several ways. First, participants were diverse in gender, including both cisgender and transgender persons. Second, dimensionality was reassessed using exploratory factor analysis, which revealed four factors: Proper Use of Health Care Resources, Diet, Anger and Stress, and Substance Use. Third, based on these results, we applied and optimized classical test theory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The endorsement of traditional masculinity ideologies may also be associated with somewhat different constructs depending on whether a person identifies as cisgender, transgender, or gender nonbinary (Levant et al, 2019). Therefore, future studies should include a more diverse sample and further test the applicability of the MRNI-SF in groups with different cultural background, sexual orientation, or gender identities (including participants who identify with a gender identity other than cis-women and cis-men; Levant, Alto, et al, 2020; Levant et al, 2019; McDermott et al, 2017). Another limitation concerning the sample is the fact that the present study used a convenience sample of university students and that some sociodemographic characteristics differed between participants in Sample 1 and in Sample 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endorsement of traditional masculinity ideologies may also be associated with somewhat different constructs depending on whether a person identifies as cisgender, transgender, or gender nonbinary (Levant et al, 2019). Therefore, future studies should include a more diverse sample and further test the applicability of the MRNI-SF in groups with different cultural background, sexual orientation, or gender identities (including participants who identify with a gender identity other than cis-women and cis-men; Levant, Alto, et al, 2020; Levant et al, 2019; McDermott et al, 2017). Another limitation concerning the sample is the fact that the present study used a convenience sample of university students and that some sociodemographic characteristics differed between participants in Sample 1 and in Sample 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the fifth section looked at health behaviour using the Health Behaviour Inventory – Short Form (HBI-SF), which uses a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) and comprises 12 items, with six items being reverse scored. It consists four subscales: The diet subscale (Cronbach’s α = 0.81), the proper use of health care resources subscale (Cronbach’s α = 0.81), the anger and stress subscale (Cronbach’s α = 0.62), and the substance use subscale (Cronbach's α = 0.73) [ 22 ]. The total score and subscale scores are derived by summing the participants’ responses and dividing by the number of items, and higher scores indicate a higher level of health risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study uses data from a larger project, from which two manuscripts have been published and one is under review (Levant et al, 2019(Levant et al, , 2020(Levant et al, , 2021. None of these manuscripts examined measurement invariance by gender broadly conceived for the MRNI-SF, MRNI-VB, and the FIS-SF or compared mean scores on these scales across different gender identity groups.…”
Section: Methods Prior Use Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%