2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diaphragm and Lung Ultrasound to Predict Weaning Outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
122
1
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
122
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-cardiac surgery patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis could be extubated without delay, when the contralateral diaphragm excursion was > 25 mm at maximal inspiratory effort [53]. In a meta-analysis of 10 studies evaluating diaphragm excursion to predict weaning failure and combining different definitions of weaning failure, the authors reported a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 65-85) and specificity of 75% (95% CI 60-85), with substantial heterogeneity [54]. As diaphragm excursion is strongly dependent of lung volume [37], the reported heterogeneity could be explained by patient position and the timing of measurements, e.g., before/during the SBT and with or without ventilator assistance.…”
Section: Diaphragm Excursionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Post-cardiac surgery patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis could be extubated without delay, when the contralateral diaphragm excursion was > 25 mm at maximal inspiratory effort [53]. In a meta-analysis of 10 studies evaluating diaphragm excursion to predict weaning failure and combining different definitions of weaning failure, the authors reported a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 65-85) and specificity of 75% (95% CI 60-85), with substantial heterogeneity [54]. As diaphragm excursion is strongly dependent of lung volume [37], the reported heterogeneity could be explained by patient position and the timing of measurements, e.g., before/during the SBT and with or without ventilator assistance.…”
Section: Diaphragm Excursionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performed during an SBT, TFdi > 30-36% has shown to predict extubation success [52,54,58]. Ferrari et al evaluated in 46 patients ventilated through a tracheostomy tube, the role of TFdi(max) of the right hemidiaphragm during an SBT, as a predictor of weaning outcome [59] and reported that a TFdi(max) > 36% was associated with a successful SBT (sensitivity 0.82; specificity 0.88; AUROC 0.95).…”
Section: Diaphragm Thickening Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have investigated these two parameters, either individually or in combination, with the aim of identifying cut-off values as predictors of successful weaning (see Table 2) [43,53,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. However, the results have been heterogeneous in terms of outcome results and cut-off values due to differences in study protocol design and outcome designation.…”
Section: Diaphragm Ultrasound (Dus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…end-inspiratory thickness The authors found that cut-off values of DE ≥ 10.5 mm, Te-insp ≥ 21 mm, and DTF > 34.2% during SBT with pressure support were associated with successful weaning; combining a DE ≥ 10.5 mm with a Te-insp. ≥ 21 mm decreased the sensitivity to 64.9%, but increased specificity up to 100% for successful weaning Zambon et al[72] The authors describe both DE and DTF to be useful weaning predictors, but only DTF is shown to be an accurate index of diaphragmatic contractility workload Llamas-Alvarez et al[73] This systematic review and metanalysis concludes that diaphragm ultrasound measures (DTF > DE) can help predict weaning outcome. It also suggests that the accuracy of DTF and DE may be overestimated in the current literature depending on the patient subpopulation studied Vivier et al[53] The authors conducted a multicenter prospective study involving 191 patients where DTF and DE data were collected during T-piece SBTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The monitoring of lung aeration during the weaning process embodies another essential aspect of LUS evaluation since it indirectly leads to successful extubation [9]. Clear evidence of the usefulness of the LUS score in the weaning process is provided in the metanalysis by Llamas-Álvarez et al in which ultrasound evaluation is concluded to provide valuable information in predicting weaning outcome [10]. Tenza-Lozano et al also came to this conclusion and went on to propose a new and more reproducible score that only considers the anterior, lateral, and posterior-basal thoracic areas [11].…”
Section: Lung Ultrasound Score (Lus)mentioning
confidence: 99%