2014
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Erfassung expansiven Verhaltens mit der deutschen Version des Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)

Abstract: In der vorliegenden Studie wurde die deutsche Version des Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) zur Erfassung von Verhaltensproblemen im Kindesalter psychometrisch untersucht. Dafür füllten Eltern von 5 218 Kindern im Alter von 2 bis 9 Jahren das ECBI sowie den Fragebogen zu Stärken und Schwächen (SDQ) aus. Darüber hinaus lieferten sie soziodemographische Daten. Die Stichprobe wurde in drei deutschen Städten über Kindertagesstätten und Grundschulen rekrutiert. Die Rücklaufquote lag bei 49 % der Zielpopulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the father-report, the age of the target children averaged M = 6.59 years ( SD = 2.87, range = 4–12 years) and 45% were female. Referring to the cut-off of ≥15 in the ECBI problem scale (Heinrichs, Bussing, Henrich, Schwarzer, & Briegel, 2014), 32.5% of the mothers (28.9% in the Triple P group and 35.9% in the control group; no significant difference between groups) rated their child’s problem behavior in the clinically elevated range at baseline assessments. Among fathers, 27.6% (23.1% in the Triple P group and 32.4% in the control group; no significant difference between groups) reported their child’s problem behavior within the clinical range at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the father-report, the age of the target children averaged M = 6.59 years ( SD = 2.87, range = 4–12 years) and 45% were female. Referring to the cut-off of ≥15 in the ECBI problem scale (Heinrichs, Bussing, Henrich, Schwarzer, & Briegel, 2014), 32.5% of the mothers (28.9% in the Triple P group and 35.9% in the control group; no significant difference between groups) rated their child’s problem behavior in the clinically elevated range at baseline assessments. Among fathers, 27.6% (23.1% in the Triple P group and 32.4% in the control group; no significant difference between groups) reported their child’s problem behavior within the clinical range at baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Problem Scale is also considered an indicator of parental distress caused by child behavior. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the ECBI derived from a community-based sample [56] showed high internal consistency for both scales on each age level (2 to 9 years) and good discrimination between different levels of behavior problems. Means of both the Intensity Scale and the Problem Scale were found to be significantly lower than in the U.S., resulting in recommended clinical problem behavior cut-off scores of 111 (Intensity Scale) and 12 (Problem Scale) [56].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the ECBI derived from a community-based sample [56] showed high internal consistency for both scales on each age level (2 to 9 years) and good discrimination between different levels of behavior problems. Means of both the Intensity Scale and the Problem Scale were found to be significantly lower than in the U.S., resulting in recommended clinical problem behavior cut-off scores of 111 (Intensity Scale) and 12 (Problem Scale) [56]. The ECBI was both administered to investigate convergent (parental perception of negative child relationship behavior) and discriminant (parental perception of positive child relationship behavior) validity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ECBI [Eyberg und Ross, 1978] (deutsche Bearbeitung durch Bussing et al 2008): Die interne Konsistenz der Intensitätsskala entsprach einem Cronbachs von 0,92 [Heinrichs et al, 2014]. Intensitätsskala: 200 (T-Wert >80).…”
Section: Parent-child Interaction Therapy -Eine Kurzbeschreibungunclassified