2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.110835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in sarcopenia prevalence and associated factors according to 2010 and 2018 European consensus (EWGSOP) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
34
3
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
34
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[26]. In geriatric patients, the literature is conflicting showing higher [27][28][29] or equal [30,31] rates of sarcopenia with the 2010 compared to the 2019 definition. The predictive utility for complications seems to be different for the 2010 and 2019 definition-in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease both definitions performed well, whereas in the UK biobank cohort the 2010 definition was superior in predicting poorer health outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26]. In geriatric patients, the literature is conflicting showing higher [27][28][29] or equal [30,31] rates of sarcopenia with the 2010 compared to the 2019 definition. The predictive utility for complications seems to be different for the 2010 and 2019 definition-in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease both definitions performed well, whereas in the UK biobank cohort the 2010 definition was superior in predicting poorer health outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies comparing EWGSOP1 and 2 have been published. Some studies show good agreement [ 9 , 11 – 13 ], but others find poor agreement between the two criteria [ 8 , 10 , 14 – 21 ]. Populations, settings, techniques, testing procedures, and cut-offs have varied, leading to differences in the prevalence of sarcopenia, making comparisons between studies difficult [ 8 , 11 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 12.5% among 1,137 patients, and the patients with sarcopenia had higher HbA1c than the patients without sarcopenia. In contrast, another report showed the prevalence of 18.7% among 267 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas a study among Chinese and European patients with type 2 diabetes reported the prevalence of sarcopenia to be 28.8% 22 and 21% 27 , respectively. HbA1c level did not differ between those with and without sarcopenia 12,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, another report showed the prevalence of 18.7% among 267 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas a study among Chinese and European patients with type 2 diabetes reported the prevalence of sarcopenia to be 28.8% 22 and 21% 27 , respectively. HbA1c level did not differ between those with and without sarcopenia 12,27 . The patients with sarcopenia in the present study were at relatively advanced ages compared with these studies 12,22,28 , and were overweight, had weak grip strength, low usual gait speed and low SMI compared with the other Japanese study 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%