2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00004183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the Capacity of Several Biochemical Bone Markers to Assess High Bone Turnover in Early Menopause and Response to Alendronate Therapy

Abstract: We measured bone mineral density (BMD), four markers of bone formation [bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP), osteocalcin (Oc), N- and C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP and PICP respectively)] and five markers of bone resorption [serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), urinary CTx, N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide (NTx), free and total deoxypyridinoline (fDpd and tDpd respectively)] in 28 healthy premenopausal women (45.7 +/- 3.0 years), 15 early (< 7 years) healthy menopausal wome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
38
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
38
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures are based on within-person SDs for a single measurement occasion of BAP and NTX of 18.2% and 30%, respectively, similar to estimates reported previously for these two markers. (25)(26)(27)(28) This large within-person variation means that the number of measurements of NTX needed to be certain of a woman's baseline level of the marker is prohibitively large (seven measurements are needed for the observed values to be within 20% of the true level with 95% certainty; if three measurements are used then observed levels are only within 31% of the true level with 95% certainty). This means that monitoring change in the marker is challenging, even though under certain circumstances, relatively few (sometimes only one) repeated measurements are needed after treatment to estimate the true treatment effect once we are certain of the baseline level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These figures are based on within-person SDs for a single measurement occasion of BAP and NTX of 18.2% and 30%, respectively, similar to estimates reported previously for these two markers. (25)(26)(27)(28) This large within-person variation means that the number of measurements of NTX needed to be certain of a woman's baseline level of the marker is prohibitively large (seven measurements are needed for the observed values to be within 20% of the true level with 95% certainty; if three measurements are used then observed levels are only within 31% of the true level with 95% certainty). This means that monitoring change in the marker is challenging, even though under certain circumstances, relatively few (sometimes only one) repeated measurements are needed after treatment to estimate the true treatment effect once we are certain of the baseline level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alendronate [10,17,18,19,20,21] Formation: BALP, PINP, PICP, OC Fracture, BMD Resorption: sCTX, uNTX, DPD Risedronate [12,22] Resorption: uDPD, uCTX, uNTX, Fracture, BMD Teriparatide [13,14,15,33] Formation: BALP, PICP, PINP Fracture, BMD Resorption: uDPD, uNTX, sCTX Raloxifene [30,31,32] Formation: BALP, PINP, OC Fracture Resorption: uCTX Early changes in BTM to monitor anti-osteoporosis therapy Similar to most chronic diseases, monitoring the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis is a challenge. In contrast to BMD, which typically changes in response to therapy less than 2-5% per year, or a maximum of 3% in 3-6 months, most of osteoporosis therapies act by reducing or increasing individual BTM levels or their ratios by 30-200% within 3-6 months.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the poor specificity and negative predictive value of these percentual cut-offs of BTM changes implied that a change in NTX or OC above the cut-point was a poor predictor of bone loss during alendronate treatment [17]. In a smaller cohort of French osteoporotic women, the authors claimed, from observation of changes in BALP, OC, P1CP, P1NP, sCTX, uNTX, total and free DPD after 4 months of alendronate, that sCTX, and to a lesser extend, uNTX, were the best predictors of a significant gain in spine BMD after 1 year of therapy [18]. Early changes of uNTX (3 months) were also shown to be good predictors of 12-month lumbar spine BMD response to alendronate in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [19].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using ROC curve analysis, very high specificity and sensitivity of the investigated biochemical bone markers CTX and OC in the diagnosis of postme nopausal osteoporosis were proven (4). Increased bone markers by 67% were discovered in women in early meno pause compared to premenopausal women (24). CTX determined by the same method Elecsys, ECLIA in the study of Garnero (25) was higher by 39% in perimenopausal women in compa rison to preme no pausal women and higher by 86% in postmeno pausal women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%