2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction effects in microwave propagation at the origin of superluminal behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There, the intensity relative to the one‐way path ( R = 16 m) was found to be about one half of the intensity relative to the double‐way path ( R = 32 m) while just the opposite seemed reasonable, as in the previous case (Interference effects between contributions of ±β r directions (not con‐ sidered here) could partially explain this incongruity.). Therefore, a possible agreement with the experimental data could be achieved by interchanging the attribution of the forerunners, namely the more intense (55 × 10 −2 ) to the one‐way path, and the other (25 × 10 −2 ) to the double‐way path, in accordance with a different wave‐path interpretation (This anomaly in the observed values of the intensity gave rise to a different interpretation of forerunners as proposed in Ref 22…”
Section: Analysis Of the Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There, the intensity relative to the one‐way path ( R = 16 m) was found to be about one half of the intensity relative to the double‐way path ( R = 32 m) while just the opposite seemed reasonable, as in the previous case (Interference effects between contributions of ±β r directions (not con‐ sidered here) could partially explain this incongruity.). Therefore, a possible agreement with the experimental data could be achieved by interchanging the attribution of the forerunners, namely the more intense (55 × 10 −2 ) to the one‐way path, and the other (25 × 10 −2 ) to the double‐way path, in accordance with a different wave‐path interpretation (This anomaly in the observed values of the intensity gave rise to a different interpretation of forerunners as proposed in Ref 22…”
Section: Analysis Of the Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In the other case [22], an analogous system was used in a “compact range” (i.e., inside an anechoic chamber) over a feed‐target distance of 16 m. In this case, a converging device was interposed between feed and target, thus producing a sort of amplification of the effects (The multiplet structure of the forerunners, observed in this case, is presumably due to the converging device, consisting of two cylindrical reflectors, but assimilated to a spherical system constituted by the combination of a real and a virtual lens [20]).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of small retardation have been observed in the propagation of evanescent waves working, for instance, with side-by-side prisms [11], undersized waveguides [12][13][14][15], in misaligned horn antennas [16,17], in experiments on frustrated total internal reflections [18] (see also the review paper [19] and references therein) etc. Superluminar behaviors have been observed also in microwave propagation experiments implementing radar technique [20] and was evidenced by the presence of forerunners in advanced positions with the main luminal peak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This latter value is surely overestimated, due to the absence of the exponential attenuation of Equation (11). If this effect is taken into account [32], as a result, we obtain…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%