Dinamika Kelompok Peternak Sapi Potong Binaan Universitas Gadjah Mada di Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

Abstract

<p class="p1">This study aimed to analyze the dynamics of cattle farmer groups assisted by Universitas Gadjah Mada (Faculty of Animal Science) in Yogyakarta Province. The total number of respondents were 77 farmers of cattle farmer groups. The tool used was a questionnaire that has proven validity and reliability. This study was conducted by survey method through the stages of preparation and execution. In the preparation phase carried out the determination of groups and cattle farmer samples using pusposive random sampling. The results showed that the dynamics of cattle farmer groups assisted by Universitas Gadjah Mada in Yogyakarta Province included in the high category. The highest group dynamics was Ngudi Barokah Group in Kulonprogo (equal to 82.48%), followed by the Sido Kumpul Group in Bantul (81.92%), then Bayu Andini Group in Sleman (77.22%), and Lembu Lestari Group in Gunungkidul (73.02%). Constituent elements of the group dynamics of goals, group structure, function assignments, development, cohesiveness, atmosphere and effectiveness of the group had a high level, while the group pressure was ini medium level.</p>

DAIRY FARMERS’ GROUP DYNAMICS IN “NEW NORMAL” ADAPTATION (A Study Case in Pujon District)

“…Thus, with an average value of 78.8%, the group goals are categorized as "high," meaning the significant members understand the group goals. According to Andarwati et al (2017), understanding the group goals shows that the members consciously reflect the same goals as their personal goals. The high value of group goals indicates the members' strong interest in collectively carrying out the goals.…”

“…Changes in the situation that are quite urgent with a short time during the pandemic will certainly affect the work program and goals that have been planned from the start. A clear understanding of group goals means that they know and are able to state and adapt to changing group goals (Andarwati, Guntoro, Haryadi, & Sulastri, 2017). If group members do not know about the goals of the group, then their participation in the livestock group does not know the direction of the group's goals and results in group activities being undirected and unproductive in the future.…”

“…Group structure can function as a pattern of the group members' relationship, which describes its position, role, and contribution within the group activities (Andarwati et al, 2017). The results of Table 3 show that the structure of group dynamics in Pujon District is considered decent and classified as "moderate," reaching the average value of 70.3%.…”

“…Each member has the initiative in carrying out their duties and functions based on the group's goals without the leader's command and depending on other members. There are six categories of measuring task functions in a group, 1) the function of disseminating information, 2) satisfying members, 3) organizing coordination, 4) growing initiatives, 5) inviting participation, and 6) explaining (Andarwati et al, 2017).…”

Factors Affecting Dynamics of Fish Processing Group in Cirebon Regency

“…Artinya, ada interaksi yang terjadi dalam kelompok secara terus menerus dan menjadi kekuatan dalam mencapai tujuan kelompok. Suatu kelompok dikatakan dinamis jika tindakan anggota dalam berinteraksi satu sama lain dan interaksi dengan lingkungan kuat, sehingga kelompok semakin kompak dan semakin mudah mencapai tujuan kelompok (Andarwati 2012; Giraldo dan Passino 2016). Cartwright dan Zander (1968) mengungkapkan bahwa kelompok yang dinamis memiliki unsur-unsur dinamika yaitu tujuan kelompok, struktur kelompok, fungsi tugas, pembinaan dan pengembangan kelompok, kekompakan kelompok, suasana kelompok, tekanan pada kelompok, keefektifan kelompok dan maksud terselubung.…”