2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion behavior of 3D-printed columns with homogeneous microstructures comprising differing element shapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capability of 3D printing technologies to enable manufacturing of optimized three dimensional ordered structures has been recently discussed [8,10,12]. In particular, printing of complex monolithic structures with defined channel size, geometry and configuration tuned for specific separations is particularly attractive.…”
Section: Printability and Resolution Of The New Materials Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The capability of 3D printing technologies to enable manufacturing of optimized three dimensional ordered structures has been recently discussed [8,10,12]. In particular, printing of complex monolithic structures with defined channel size, geometry and configuration tuned for specific separations is particularly attractive.…”
Section: Printability and Resolution Of The New Materials Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were printed with high fidelity and reproducibility to the original CAD designs. 3D printing also opened the opportunity to explore alternative bed configurations and particle shapes, allowing experimental demonstration that spherical particles are not necessarily the best shape for chromatographic operations, and that new bed morphologies can improve pressure drop and plate height characteristics [12]. Yet, only commercially available urethane-based materials for 3D polyjet printing could be tested, and flow performance of the columns was determined by residence time distribution experiments with non-retained tracers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that such arrangement would be attractive for use in real chromatographic stationary phases. In addition, practical limitations in 3D printing capabilities, such as the large file size needed to describe the entire internal geometry of the packing [12], and the fidelity of the printed objects [13], are more easily overcome with a looser configuration of particles, making this arrangement a realistic goal in practical manufacturing terms. A potential drawback with SC packing is the physical instability of the bed, wherein the high voidage might cause the particles to move under the influence of physical vibration, thus disrupting the ordered bed arrangement.…”
Section: Mesh Independence Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printing was recently employed by Fee et al to fabricate perfectly ordered column packings, revolutionizing the design and production of chromatographic stationary phases [12]. Later, Nawada et al evaluated the performance of 3D printed beds of ordered particles, thus experimentally validating the trends predicted by the above computational studies [13]. The exponential growth we are currently witnessing in the 3D printing arena indicates that AM methods with improved resolution, reduced printing times, and enlarged build sizes will soon be available, making the printing of chromatographic stationary phases a reality at industrial scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“… Active molding : As suggested by Tallarek and coworkers [31], active shaping of macroporous space would significantly increase transcolumn homogeneity of monoliths. Although this approach has been already demonstrated in the literature [38,39], it is necessary to introduce yet other protocols to improve radial homogeneity of polymeric separation materials. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) : Nowadays, 3D printing belongs to one of the most expanding directions in separation science [40–42], and there are already research groups devoting their potential to the development of 3D‐printed stationary phases [43–46]. A coverage of 3D‐printed scaffold by a polymeric material seems to be the simplest way to produce highly ordered stationary phases with selected surface chemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%