2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.2980137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Deception Attack Detection in Platoon-Based Connected Vehicle Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the structure of OSV-MPC, by not using control elements, allows the implementation of more elaborate failure detection controls (FTC), some of which are used in other branches of electronics, opening a vast field of studies related to these topics [59,60].…”
Section: Equal Capacitancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the structure of OSV-MPC, by not using control elements, allows the implementation of more elaborate failure detection controls (FTC), some of which are used in other branches of electronics, opening a vast field of studies related to these topics [59,60].…”
Section: Equal Capacitancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…e experimental results show that the scheme is effective. A modified generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) algorithm is proposed to detect and estimate the sensor deception attacks based on the distributed Kalman filter [12]. e effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is verified by simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect the inside attack, platoon members need to distinguish the true/false information written in received messages. Several studies have proposed detection methods using various techniques such as set-membership filtering, Kalman filter, and sliding mode control [14]- [16]. Nevertheless, it remains challenging to develop efficient detection methods, considering the complicated factors such as time delay of messages and engine actuation lag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%