2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2015.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetry for electron Intra-Operative RadioTherapy: Comparison of output factors obtained through alanine/EPR pellets, ionization chamber and Monte Carlo-GEANT4 simulations for IORT mobile dedicate accelerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23] As a result, the 2003 guidelines developed by the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS, National Health Service) recommended using ferrous sulfate dosimetry, 24 as provided by the National Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology (INMRI, ENEA, Italy, called as "ENEA-INMRI" hereafter), or alternatively alanine dosimeters. 25,26 It was recommended that chemical dosimetry be managed by a Primary Metrological Institute or by a recognized calibration center due to the highly critical nature of these measurements. 21 Concerning ferrous sulfate dosimetry, the irradiation of the detector and its reading are not simultaneous, and the overall process, from detector ordering to the final readout, generally takes some months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20][21][22][23] As a result, the 2003 guidelines developed by the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS, National Health Service) recommended using ferrous sulfate dosimetry, 24 as provided by the National Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology (INMRI, ENEA, Italy, called as "ENEA-INMRI" hereafter), or alternatively alanine dosimeters. 25,26 It was recommended that chemical dosimetry be managed by a Primary Metrological Institute or by a recognized calibration center due to the highly critical nature of these measurements. 21 Concerning ferrous sulfate dosimetry, the irradiation of the detector and its reading are not simultaneous, and the overall process, from detector ordering to the final readout, generally takes some months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high number of monitor units increases the measurement time and, potentially, the required thickness of the shielding barriers. 15 Since 2003, many studies 14,16,22,23,26 have been published dealing with the dosimetric issues related to NOVAC and LIAC accelerators, hence it is worthwhile reconsidering the use of ionization chambers. In this respect, the aim of this study was to validate ionization chambers for the reference dosimetry of NOVAC and LIAC by comparison with ferrous sulfate dosimetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marrale et al . compared the OF measurements by means of PTW Markus chamber, Alanine for NOVAC7 model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIAC ® has considerably low PRF varying from 1 to 60 Hz in contrast the conventional LINACs work between 200 and 400 Hz . Thus, LIAC ® can generate DPP of 0.1 to 5 cGy/p which are notably higher than conventional LINACs (around 0.05–0.6 cGy/p) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to compensate for small disomogenities inside the samples, the standard samples read-out process consisted of four readings for each sample. Between two successive measurements the pellet is rotated by 90 around its axis in the ESR cavity [68]. For dose estimation, the difference between the maximum and the minimum of the ESR signal is used (peak to peak amplitude).…”
Section: Esr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%