2011
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.50.04dc07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Material Gate Approach to Suppression of Random-Dopant-Induced Characteristic Fluctuation in 16 nm Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Field-Effect-Transistor Devices

Abstract: In this work, we explore for the first time dual-material gate (DMG) and inverse DMG devices for suppressing the random-dopant (RD)-induced characteristic fluctuation in 16 nm metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect-transistor (MOSFET) devices. The physical mechanism of suppressing the characteristic fluctuation of DMG devices is observed and discussed. The achieved improvement in suppressing the RD-induced threshold voltage, on-state current, and off-state current fluctuations are 28, 12.3, and 59%, respective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DMG-JNT and the conventional JNT are simulated with 5 nm radius(R), 1 nm EOT and doping concentration (N d ) of 1 × 10 19 cm −3 unless otherwise noted. As for the DMG-JNT, work functions of the two metal gates, 'control gate' and 'screen gate', are initially designed to be 5.1 eV (M 1 ) and 4.52 eV (M 2 ), respectively, according to the guidelines in [26]. The lengths of them are initially set to be L 1 = L 2 .…”
Section: Energy Band Analysis and Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DMG-JNT and the conventional JNT are simulated with 5 nm radius(R), 1 nm EOT and doping concentration (N d ) of 1 × 10 19 cm −3 unless otherwise noted. As for the DMG-JNT, work functions of the two metal gates, 'control gate' and 'screen gate', are initially designed to be 5.1 eV (M 1 ) and 4.52 eV (M 2 ), respectively, according to the guidelines in [26]. The lengths of them are initially set to be L 1 = L 2 .…”
Section: Energy Band Analysis and Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%