2005
DOI: 10.1038/nature03882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early planetesimal melting from an age of 4.5662 Gyr for differentiated meteorites

Abstract: Long- and short-lived radioactive isotopes and their daughter products in meteorites are chronometers that can test models for Solar System formation. Differentiated meteorites come from parent bodies that were once molten and separated into metal cores and silicate mantles. Mineral ages for these meteorites, however, are typically younger than age constraints for planetesimal differentiation. Such young ages indicate that the energy required to melt their parent bodies could not have come from the most likely… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
186
6
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
32
186
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Angrites are among the oldest basaltic rocks in the Solar System (Baker et al, 2005;Nyquist et al, 2009;Dauphas and Chaussidon, 2011). Only 19 angrites are recognized.…”
Section: Sample Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angrites are among the oldest basaltic rocks in the Solar System (Baker et al, 2005;Nyquist et al, 2009;Dauphas and Chaussidon, 2011). Only 19 angrites are recognized.…”
Section: Sample Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, several groups have developed a wide range of thermal models of planetesimals with short-lived radioactive nuclides (mainly 26 Al but also 60 Fe) as the main heat source (e.g., Miyamoto et al 1981;Miyamoto 1991;Grimm and McSween 1993;Bennett and McSween 1996;Akridge et al 1998;Merk et al 2002;Ghosh et al 2003;Tachibana & Huss 2003;Trieloff et al 2003;Bizzarro et al 2005;Baker et al 2005;Mostefaoui et al 2005;Hevey & Sanders 2006;Sahijpal et al 2007;Harrison & Grimm 2010;Elkins-Tanton et al 2011;Henke et al 2012aHenke et al , 2012bNeumann et al 2012;Monnereau et al 2013). In the context of ordinary chondrite parent bodies, such models predict an onion-shell structure (Trieloff et al 2003;Ghosh et al 2006;Henke et al 2012aHenke et al , 2012bHenke et al , 2013Wood 2003, and references therein), where all petrologic types formed on the same parent body with type 3 OCs being representative of the crust and type 6 OCs being representative of the core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,9,11,14,15,17,19] Nevertheless, debate continues regarding: (1) whether the earth has a chondritic Mg isotopic composition or not, [7][8][9]13,18,20] and (2) the accuracy of Mg isotopic compositions reported by different labs for certain geostandards, such as BCR-1, BCR-2 and San Carlos olivine. [5,9,10,12,13,16,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25] Both debates may reflect the presence of MC-ICP-MS analytical artifacts in high-precision Mg isotopic analyses conducted at different laboratories. [7][8][9]18,20] Analyses of geostandards BCR-1 and BCR-2 in different laboratories yielded significantly different Mg isotopic compositions ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%