2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-9878-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake early warning scenarios at critical facilities in the Eastern Caribbean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity of this assumption does not significantly affect the outcomes of the study, however; removing from the analyses sources for which δ m ≥ 12 and the nearest station is less than 80 km does not change the conclusions of the work. δ t captures data telemetry delays, which are idealistically assumed to comprise 1 s for data transmission and 1 s for issuing the warning message [66][67][68] .…”
Section: Lead-time Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this assumption does not significantly affect the outcomes of the study, however; removing from the analyses sources for which δ m ≥ 12 and the nearest station is less than 80 km does not change the conclusions of the work. δ t captures data telemetry delays, which are idealistically assumed to comprise 1 s for data transmission and 1 s for issuing the warning message [66][67][68] .…”
Section: Lead-time Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthetic seismograms for Southern Italy and the Pyrenees are computed from physics-based numerical simulations, using the broadband ground-motion simulation code described in Crempien and Archuleta (2015), which can simulate the high-frequency content of seismic waves and has already proved to be suitable for EEW feasibility studies (Zuccolo et al, 2016). We specifically generate seismograms for one scenario earthquake on each active fault in both regions.…”
Section: Seismic Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some regions (e.g. Italy, Chinese mainland, Switzerland, Chile, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and El Salvador) are currently testing EEW systems within their seismic monitoring networks (Clinton et al, 2016;Leyton et al, 2018;Massin et al, 2019; and see next section for details of Chinese mainland), while others are only at the stage of discussing the need and feasibility of developing EEW systems (Bird et al, 2008;Stankiewicz et al, 2015;Romeu Petit et al, 2016;Sokos et al, 2016;Zuccolo et al, 2016;Ogweno et al, 2019). Recently, crowdsourcing (Hammon and Hippner, 2012) has been applied as a promising new technique to EEW, allowing the general public to record seismic data/records with micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) in smart devices and to receive earthquake alerts in real-time on a global or regional scale (Minson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%