2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bulk growth temperature on antiphase domain boundary annihilation rate in MOCVD-grown GaAs on Si(001)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Same results were found in the research on the GaAs nucleation layer on GaP/Si (001): the TDD first decreased as the growth temperature increased from 400 to 500 °C, but when the growth temperature increased further to 550 °C, the TDD rose back to a high level [29]. Likewise, the findings in [23] showed that there was an optimal growth temperature to suppress APDs in MOCVD-grown GaAs on Si (001) by a two-step process. The reason is similar to the analysis for the cross-sectional and surface morphology.…”
Section: Crystal Structuresupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Same results were found in the research on the GaAs nucleation layer on GaP/Si (001): the TDD first decreased as the growth temperature increased from 400 to 500 °C, but when the growth temperature increased further to 550 °C, the TDD rose back to a high level [29]. Likewise, the findings in [23] showed that there was an optimal growth temperature to suppress APDs in MOCVD-grown GaAs on Si (001) by a two-step process. The reason is similar to the analysis for the cross-sectional and surface morphology.…”
Section: Crystal Structuresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, it is important to find out the optimal growth parameters for the InP nucleation layer. Many researches have been performed focused on the influences of growth temperatures, thickness, and flow ratio of V/III sources of Ge [22] or GaAs [23] nucleation layer on Si, or InP nucleation layer on GaAs [24,25] or Si [26] by MOCVD. The findings of the above studies indicate that these parameters have significant impact on the growth behaviors, such as surface morphology and crystal quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-section dark-field TEM images taken along the <110> direction using g = (002) reflection of GaP/Si(001) (S1) and GaP/GaPN/GaP/Si(001) (S2) heterostructures are presented in Figure a,b correspondingly. As was discussed in refs and , these parameters were chosen to provide contrast between APDs. The mosaic structure of the GaP film with an average lateral grain size of 50 nm is clearly seen in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The {112} plane's formation energy is intermediate what makes these planes good candidates for the APB self‐annihilation . Experimentally it was shown that the self‐annihilation behavior and the resulting boundary planes can be influenced by the growth conditions, especially by the growth temperature …”
Section: Antiphase Domains: Formation Detection Quantification Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior highlights the influence of the growth temperature on the self‐annihilation of the APDs which was already shown in refs. . The APB sections marked in white correspond to higher index planes which have not been considered before.…”
Section: Antiphase Domains: Formation Detection Quantification Andmentioning
confidence: 99%