Effect of Metal Priming Agents on Bond Strength of Resin-modified Glass Ionomers Jointed to Gold Alloy

Furuchi, Mika; Oshima, Akiko; Ishikawa, Yumi; Koizumi, Hiroyasu; Tanoue, Naomi; Matsumura, Hideo

doi:10.4012/dmj.26.728

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3 Recent studies have shown higher bond strengths for self-adhesive resin cements compared to RMGICs when bonded to a variety of materials such as noble and non-noble alloys, zirconia, aluminum oxide ceramic, and pressable ceramic. 4,5 Different studies have reported on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel and dentin, 1,2,[6][7][8][9] as well as different substrates such as alloys, [10][11][12][13] ceramics, 4,14 and polymers. 15 However, most of these studies concentrate on a single substrate, type of setting reaction, or testing time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates

Sabatini¹,

Patel²,

D'Silva³

2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-adhesive resin cements demonstrated superior bond strength to a variety of prosthodontic substrates relative to resin-modified glass ionomer cement, indicating that they are able to provide a wider array of clinical applications. However, selection of the cement should be determined largely by the type of substrate and setting reaction. SUMMARYObjective: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to different prosthodontic substrates.Materials and Methods: The substrates base metal, noble metal, zirconia, ceramic, and resin composite were used for bonding with different cements (n=12). Specimens were placed in a bonding jig, which was filled with one of four cements (RelyX Unicem, Multilink Automix, Maxcem Elite, and FujiCEM Automix). Both light-polymerizing (LP) and selfpolymerizing (SP) setting reactions were tested. Shear bond strength was measured at 15 minutes and 24 hours in a testing device at a test speed of 1 mm/min and expressed in MPa. A Student t-test and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate differences between setting reactions, between testing times, and among cements irrespective of other factors. Generalized linear regression model and Tukey tests were used for multifactorial analysis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates

Sabatini¹,

Patel²,

D'Silva³

2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The effectiveness of the primers for bonding resin cements to precious metal alloys and base metal alloys was confirmed in some studies (19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Self-adhesive cements are a nonhomogeneous group with regard to their bond values and chemical composition and differ significantly in their bonding to base metal alloys (24).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Tensile Strength of Resin Cements Used with Base Metals in a Simulating Passive Cementation Technique for Implant-Supported Prostheses

Filho

Ribeiro

et al. 2016

Braz. Dent. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to analyze the tensile strength of two different resin cements used in passive cementation technique for implant-supported prosthesis. Ninety-six plastic cylinders were waxed in standardized forms, cast in commercially pure titanium, nickel-chromium and nickel-chromium-titanium alloys. Specimens were cemented on titanium cylinders using self-adhesive resin cement or conventional dual-cured resin cement. Specimens were divided in 12 groups (n=8) in accordance to metal, cement and ageing process. Specimens were immersed in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and half of them was thermocycled for 5,000 cycles. Specimens were submitted to bond strength test in a universal test machine EMIC-DL2000 at 5 mm/min speed. Statistical analysis evidenced higher tensile strength for self-adhesive resin cement than conventional dual-cured resin cement, whatever the used metal. Self-adhesive resin cement presented higher tensile strength compared to conventional dual-cured resin cement. In conclusion, metal type and ageing process did not influence the tensile strength results.

show abstract

“…However, it is a common view that the accomplishment of an ideal bonding to both dental [14-16] and prosthesis's surfaces [17][18][19][20][21], some specific pretreatments should be employed. The effectiveness of surface pretreatments depends not only on the operators' skills and experience but also on the quality of specific equipment, along with their sensitive manipulation, used to accomplish such procedures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In Vitro Bonding Performance of Modern Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Conventional Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements to Prosthetic Substrates

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed at evaluating the shear bond strength (SBS) of modern self-adhesive resin cements and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied to different prosthetic substrates. Zirconia, lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic and a noble metal alloy were used as bonding substrates. They were all sand-blasted with alumina, while LD was further etched with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid (10 s). A light-curing resin-modified glass ionomer cement (3M-GIC: Ketac Cem Plus) and a self-curing resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GC-GIC: FujiCEM 2) were compared to self-adhesive resin cements (PAN: Panavia SA Universal) and (3M-RES: Rely X Unicem 2). Ten specimens for each substrate were produced and up to five cylinders of each cement were bonded to each substrate. The shear bond strength (SBS) was evaluated after 24 h or after thermocycling (TC) aging (5000 cycles). The data was statistically analysed by two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls test (α = 0.05). Failure modes were analysed through stereoscopic microscopy. The greatest SBS was attained with PAN, whilst 3M-GIC showed the lowest SBS and failed prevalently in adhesive mode. No difference in SBS was observed between GC-GIC and 3M-RES. After TC aging, all cements showed significant drop (p < 0.05) in SBS, but PAN showed the greatest SBS. Reliable bond strength to prosthetic substrates can be achieved with specific universal resin-luting cements and may be an alternative to glass ionomer cements when luting alloy substrates.

show abstract

Effect of Metal Priming Agents on Bond Strength of Resin-modified Glass Ionomers Jointed to Gold Alloy

Cited by 14 publications

References 13 publications

In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates

In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates

Tensile Strength of Resin Cements Used with Base Metals in a Simulating Passive Cementation Technique for Implant-Supported Prostheses

In Vitro Bonding Performance of Modern Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Conventional Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements to Prosthetic Substrates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About