2006
DOI: 10.1002/sia.2238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of oxide thickness on the degradation of organic silane monolayers on silicon wafer surface during XPS measurement

Abstract: Many organic materials are damaged and decompose by irradiation of X-rays during XPS measurements. Factors for the decomposition and/or degradation are considered to be X-ray, radiant heat and electrons from the X-ray source, photoelectrons and the inelastically scattered electrons from the sample itself, and so on. We have established the method to evaluate the effect of electrons from the sample by using various inorganic materials as substrates. In this paper, the effect of the thickness of surface oxide la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4shows the change in the particular peaks of CPTES-Si, BPTMS-Si and PFDT-Au with time. The intensity of the Cl 2p peak of CPTES-Si, the Br 3d peak of BPTMS-Si and the F 1s peak of PFDT-Au decreases within the measurement cycles as shown in other studies[18]. These results imply that all prepared organic silane monolayers on silicon wafer were damaged during XPS measurement.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4shows the change in the particular peaks of CPTES-Si, BPTMS-Si and PFDT-Au with time. The intensity of the Cl 2p peak of CPTES-Si, the Br 3d peak of BPTMS-Si and the F 1s peak of PFDT-Au decreases within the measurement cycles as shown in other studies[18]. These results imply that all prepared organic silane monolayers on silicon wafer were damaged during XPS measurement.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…It is well known that the surface damages have been observed during XPS measurement for many organic materials, such as polymers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], Langmuir-Blodgett films [12][13][14], and organosilane [15][16][17][18] and alkanethiol [18][19] monolayers on solid substrates. Factors for the surface damage are considered to be X-ray irradiation, heat radiation from filament, photoelectrons generated from the sample itself, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dosage can in principle be calculated from literature mass attenuation coefficients, 21 but the calculation of absolute X-ray dosage is difficult for this type of experimental setup and for such thin film samples. One approach to quantify dosage in this type of setups was developed by Suzuki et al [22][23][24] using the xps intensity of a standard sample (Ag 3d5/2 ) to obtain a relative dose from which an "apparatus damaging factor" can be obtained with units of cps −1 eV −1 s −1 . Instead, we have used the mass attenuation coefficients and the photoelectron yield to estimate the absolute X-ray dosage on the Nafion film.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 This method has been shown to produce a thin homogenous CTMS layer (Figure 1b The standard (1 µg cm -3 ) Be (II) ion solution was prepared from anhydrous beryllium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.01 M HCl solution, as described previously. 9 Aliquots of this standard solution were used to make the sample solution in a 25 cm -3 volumetric flask, with 5 cm -3 0.01 M disodium EDTA solution, Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%