2012
DOI: 10.1080/00150193.2012.731991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sample Size on Measurement Reliability of Microwave Dielectric Properties of Low-Loss Materials by a Resonant Cavity Method

Abstract: The microwave dielectric properties of SrTiO 3 and CaNdAlO 4 single crystals were measured by the resonant cavity method, and the effect of sample size on measurement reliability was investigated. High measurement accuracy could always be achieved for SrTiO 3 , while the measurement was completely unreliable for CaNdAlO 4 with small sizes. The difference was attributed to the much higher dielectric constant and electric energy filling factor of SrTiO 3 . It is indicated that the sample with much smaller size t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Q u and tan δ represent the unloaded quality factor and the dielectric loss of samples, respectively. 15,16 In this work, P e and Q c /Q u were higher than 0.94 and 4.5, respectively for all measurements, which indicates the high reliability of the measured Qf value.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where Q u and tan δ represent the unloaded quality factor and the dielectric loss of samples, respectively. 15,16 In this work, P e and Q c /Q u were higher than 0.94 and 4.5, respectively for all measurements, which indicates the high reliability of the measured Qf value.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The Q values at 7–15 GHz were determined by using the silver‐plated copper cavity with a dimension of 23.6 mm in diameter and 11.8 mm in height and the samples with a diameter of ∼10 mm and thickness of 5 mm, while the Q values at 15 to 28 GHz were determined by a half‐size resonant cavity and samples. The value of electrical filling factor P e and quality factor of conducting metal walls Q c determine the measurement reliability of the Q value, 1Qnormalubadbreak=Pe0.33emtanδgoodbreak+1Qnormalc,$$\begin{equation}\frac{1}{{{{Q}_{\mathrm{u}}}}} = {{P}_e}\ \tan \delta + \frac{1}{{{{Q}_{\mathrm{c}}}}},\end{equation}$$where Q u and tan δ represent the unloaded quality factor and the dielectric loss of samples, respectively 15,16 . In this work, P e and Q c / Q u were higher than 0.94 and 4.5, respectively for all measurements, which indicates the high reliability of the measured Qf value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Q u and Q c are the unloaded quality factor and the quality factor of conducting cavity walls, respectively, and P e and Q are the electrical filling factor and quality factor of the sample, respectively. 24 P e and Q c /Q u were higher than 0.92 and 5.5, respectively, for all the measurements, indicating the measurement reliability of the Qf value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The small samples and resonant cavity were used to avoid difficulties in analyzing TE 0np modes with large n or p values. The measurement reliability of Qf value by the resonant cavity method with TE 01δ and high‐order TE 0np modes can be estimated by the values of P e and Q c / Q u in 1Qu=PenormalQ0.28em+1Qcwhere Q u and Q c are the unloaded quality factor and the quality factor of conducting cavity walls, respectively, and P e and Q are the electrical filling factor and quality factor of the sample, respectively 24 . P e and Q c /Q u were higher than 0.92 and 5.5, respectively, for all the measurements, indicating the measurement reliability of the Qf value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%