2013
DOI: 10.1097/00024776-201305000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Simulation on the Development of Critical Thinking in Associate Degree Nursing Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also no difference in the students' satisfaction with their education between the group using the mobile application and the group using the high-fidelity human patient simulator. This finding is supported by a previous study that found no statistically significant difference in critical thinking skill between groups using a high-fidelity human patient simulator and a low-fidelity simulator (Goodstone et al, 2013). In addition, we found that a mobile application is more effective in knowledge retention than a human patient simulator.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There was also no difference in the students' satisfaction with their education between the group using the mobile application and the group using the high-fidelity human patient simulator. This finding is supported by a previous study that found no statistically significant difference in critical thinking skill between groups using a high-fidelity human patient simulator and a low-fidelity simulator (Goodstone et al, 2013). In addition, we found that a mobile application is more effective in knowledge retention than a human patient simulator.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, two of the three studies reported no statistical significance of simulation on students' critical thinking skills (Goodstone et al, 2013;Shinnick & Woo, 2013), whereas one study revealed a decrease in students' critical thinking scores (Shinnick & Woo, 2013). Perhaps findings from this unfolding case study and others (Goodstone et al, 2013;Shinnick & Woo, 2013;Sullivan-Mann et al, 2009) indicate that the HSRT is not a consistent tool across various nursing student populations to evaluate nursing students' critical thinking, as the number of nursing research findings to support this offering is increasing.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Currently, research findings are inconsistent in nursing education regarding the use of the HSRT tool to test critical thinking skills (Goodstone et al, 2013;Shinnick & Woo, 2013;Sullivan-Mann, Perron, & Fellner, 2009). In particular, two of the three studies reported no statistical significance of simulation on students' critical thinking skills (Goodstone et al, 2013;Shinnick & Woo, 2013), whereas one study revealed a decrease in students' critical thinking scores (Shinnick & Woo, 2013).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings were supported by Maneval et al 22 and Goodstone et al 23 who conducted studies which measured the effectiveness of HFS versus classroom-based activities and found no statistical significance in the critical thinking and clinical decision-making abilities of the participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%