1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0025846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of stimulus variation upon resistance to extinction in kindergarten children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the stimuli in these studies may have altered resistance because they were established as conditioned reinforcers rather than as discriminative stimuli during acquisition. For example, Viney, Hulicka, Bitner, Raley, and Brewster (1968) manipulated the number of stimuli that were common to both acquisition and extinction conditions with 60 kindergarten children who were taught a two-choice discrimination task. When a subject responded correctly in acquisition, delivery of the reinforcer (a marble) was accompanied by an audible click, a red light, a blue light, a bell, and a buzzer.…”
Section: Stimulus Change Basic (Nonclinical) Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the stimuli in these studies may have altered resistance because they were established as conditioned reinforcers rather than as discriminative stimuli during acquisition. For example, Viney, Hulicka, Bitner, Raley, and Brewster (1968) manipulated the number of stimuli that were common to both acquisition and extinction conditions with 60 kindergarten children who were taught a two-choice discrimination task. When a subject responded correctly in acquisition, delivery of the reinforcer (a marble) was accompanied by an audible click, a red light, a blue light, a bell, and a buzzer.…”
Section: Stimulus Change Basic (Nonclinical) Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rincover & Koegel, 1975), and resistance may be further enhanced by pairing additional stimuli with reinforcement and introducing them during extinction (cf. Viney et al, 1968). Further studies should investigate the efficacy of these strategies as well as the effects of stimulus change on other characteristics of the extinction process.…”
Section: Applied Research and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%