2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Young's modulus of active materials on ion transport through solid electrolyte in all-solid-state lithium-ion battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of the LGPS decreases while the proportion of the NCMs increases up to a stack pressure of 12 MPa. In composites with different Young's moduli, large pressures can be applied to materials that have larger Young's moduli 23 . NCM particles are preferentially pushed into the measurement space.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proportion of the LGPS decreases while the proportion of the NCMs increases up to a stack pressure of 12 MPa. In composites with different Young's moduli, large pressures can be applied to materials that have larger Young's moduli 23 . NCM particles are preferentially pushed into the measurement space.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is the fabrication pressure and the latter is the stack pressure. The parameters of the pressure have a direct effect on the void fraction in the composite electrode and change the apparent ionic conductivity [21][22][23] . Stack pressure is necessary to maintain proper contact between the electrode and the SE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2−4 Sulfide SEs can provide a good interparticle Li conduction path between SEs and electrode active materials because of their highly deformable property. 1,5,6 Therefore, many reports show relatively high performance of sulfide-type all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. 1,4,7 On the other hand, oxide-type allsolid-state lithium-ion batteries show much lower battery performance, 1,8,9 in spite of there being many ionic conductive SEs for high conductivities above 10 −3 S cm −1 , such as NASICON, garnet, and perovskite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic conductivity of SEs and the preparation of Li and electron conduction pathways between particles are very important for improving the battery performance of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Some sulfide SEs exhibit high ionic conductivities above 10 –2 S cm –1 , such as Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 , Li 7 P 3 S 11 , and Li 9.54 Si 1.74 P 1.44 S1 1.7 Cl 0.3 . Sulfide SEs can provide a good interparticle Li conduction path between SEs and electrode active materials because of their highly deformable property. ,, Therefore, many reports show relatively high performance of sulfide-type all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. ,, On the other hand, oxide-type all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries show much lower battery performance, ,, in spite of there being many ionic conductive SEs for high conductivities above 10 –3 S cm –1 , such as NASICON, garnet, and perovskite. The reason considered is that these SEs have difficulty in providing a good Li conduction path between the electrode active materials and SEs because of their hardness. Recently, there have been reports of highly deformable oxide–glass SEs, which provide good interparticle contacts. In particular, we reported that a cold-pressed pellet of 50Li 2 SO 4 –50Li 2 CO 3 glass exhibited a relative density above 99% and slight transparency without any specific void because of its excellent deformable properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%