1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90381-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: Part III—Physical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
40
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently the MTT method is considered as a sensitive index to evaluate the cytotoxicity of dental materials 27–29. In the present study, the cytotoxicity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers was assessed by MTT assay, which is a well‐established method for dental material testing 30–32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently the MTT method is considered as a sensitive index to evaluate the cytotoxicity of dental materials 27–29. In the present study, the cytotoxicity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers was assessed by MTT assay, which is a well‐established method for dental material testing 30–32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study, specimens were subjected to different aging intervals (200, 400, and 600 hours) to simulate prostheses being in service for a period of 7 to 20 months, as patients wear their prostheses for an average of 8 to 12 hours per day. This timeframe was selected because it is consistent with the literature on average service periods for silicone prostheses, which depend on patients’ habits, climate, and environmental conditions 20,21,24,30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such changes caused the silicone specimens to be less elastic when pulling the fibers out of them, so that the bond strength with the glass fibers was weakened and decreased in value. Aging for 600 hours greatly weakened the interfacial strengths with the embedded fibers, suggesting that longer durations of aging adversely affected silicones and altered their properties to a greater extent 24,33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Environmental conditions can induce significant changes in the extension of cross-linking, strongly affecting the physical and mechanical properties of polymers. 10 Sunlight, temperature, moisture, wind, dust, and pollutants are the main climate factors negatively affecting the mechanical stability and causing degradation. 11,12 More precisely, deterioration has been reported to be a photo-oxidative attack that is the combined action of oxygen and sunlight on their chemical structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%