Effects of Price versus Non-Price Export Promotion: The Case of Cotton

Kinnucan, Henry W.; Duffy, Patricia A.; Ackerman, Karen Z.

doi:10.2307/1349658

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In trying to determine the appropriate export promotion strategy, Kinnucan, Duffy, and Ackerman (1995) evaluate the effects of price versus nonprice promotion on US cotton prices, domestic use of cotton, exports of cotton, and the cost of cotton programs. The study suggests that nonprice promotion can be an effective way to reduce government costs of farm programs when the advertising elasticity of export demand is high and the own-price elasticity of demand for exports is relatively low.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Value of Export Incentives

Ahmad

2015

LJE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study develops a methodology for the comparative analysis of industry-specific export incentives. The impact of different export incentives extended to the textiles sector in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh is analyzed using industry-level data for the years 2001–11. Our findings show that Bangladesh operates a highly export-oriented regime – of the three countries, the value of its export incentives is highest. The study suggests that, in order to maintain its competitiveness in textile exports, Pakistan needs to enhance its export incentives, particularly for value-added textiles.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Value of Export Incentives

Ahmad

2015

LJE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We employ a modified version ofthe simulation framework developed by Kinnucan, Duffy, and Ackerman (1995) to determine the effectiveness of price versus nonprice incentives for u.S. cotton exports. The model used here is modified such that domestic demand for poultry meat is a function not only of domestic price, but also ofincome and price ofa substitute (pork or beef).'…”

Section: Methodology Data and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Promotion Programs for U.S. Poultry Exports

Shahid

Gempesaw

2002

Agric. resour. econ. rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abdus Shahid and Conrado M. Gempesaw, IIThis study examines the effectiveness of price versus nonprice promotion programs for U.S. poultry exports. A comparative static simulation framework is specified for this purpose. The elasticities needed for the simulation model are estimated using seemingly unrelated regression and time-varying parameter regression techniques. Results from this study indicate that a price subsidy is more effective than nonprice market promotion programs in raising export demand for U.S. poultry.

show abstract

“…These expenditures over the 2000–04 period covered by our simulations averaged $7.0 billion per year (USDA 2006). Research on cotton, a major recipient of federal subsidies both for export promotion and for price support, indicates substantial marginal gains to the taxpayer from increased expenditures for export promotion (Ding and Kinnucan 1996; Kinnucan, Duffy, and Ackerman 1995). Then, too, we have not considered competitor expenditures, which might increase or decrease the optimum level of spending depending, inter alia , on the slope of reaction functions (Alston, Freebairn, and James 2001).…”

Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%