2013
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the surface characteristics of nanoporous titanium oxide films on Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn alloy on the initial adhesion of osteoblast-like MG-63 cells

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of the surface characteristics of nanoporous titanium oxide films, formed by anodization on Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn (Ti2448) alloy, on the early adhesion of osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. Nanoporous titanium oxide films with two different pore sizes (30 and 90 nm) were formed by anodization in NH4F solution on Ti2448 alloy. The surface roughness of the nanoporous titanium oxide films was determined using a Surftest Formtracer and field emission scanning electro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no superiority to Ti surfaces could be detected. These results coincide with previous studies that showed that bone cells have a better adhesion, growth, differentiation, and phenotypic maturation on surfaces with a roughness of tens of nanometers than on flat surfaces and surfaces with a submicron‐ or microscale roughness …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, no superiority to Ti surfaces could be detected. These results coincide with previous studies that showed that bone cells have a better adhesion, growth, differentiation, and phenotypic maturation on surfaces with a roughness of tens of nanometers than on flat surfaces and surfaces with a submicron‐ or microscale roughness …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Osteoblasts responses were rather conflicting in the literature, with some agreed on better cell viability found on nanotube less than 30 nm pore diameter (Group 1) [31,32] and some suggested greater osteoblastic functions found on pore diameter between 30 nm and 50 nm (Group 2) [13,[26][27][28][29][30], but only a few have proposed high osteogenic responses on the nanotube layer with pore diameter over 70 nm (Group 3) [33,35]. It is worth noting that the reports published in Group 1 and Group 3 were limited to only cell adhesion percentage [31], cell viability and proliferation rate [32], with a limited comparison between nanotube ranges [33] and generalised assumptions on osteoblastic responses [35], these studies were lacking a clear reasoning on osteogenic differentiation in general.…”
Section: Human Osteoblastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work determining the relationship between nanotube diameter and mesenchymal stem progenitor cells suggested that a nanotube diameter below 30 nm led to enhanced mesenchymal osteogenic ability [14,[17][18][19][20][21][22], with a small number of reports proposing that 70 nm to 100 nm is more favourable for mesenchymal stem cells [14,23,24], and a single study that has reported that 30 and 50 nm stimulated early osteoblastic gene expression [25]. However, for in-vitro osteoblastic cell lines studies, greater bone mineralisation has been demonstrated on the surfaces of nanotubes with a diameter range of 30 to 50 nm [26][27][28][29][30], while others have suggested that nanotube diameters of 15 to 30 nm displayed higher cell viability and proliferation [13,31,32]. Other published works comparing the unilateral nanotube samples to that of non-anodised samples indicated that 70 to 80 nm exhibited greater osteogenic ability [33][34][35], but those results are not adequate as a more extensive sample size should be included to obtain a more precise conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a NPTNTZO(c) layer demonstrates high corrosion resistance 33 , protecting this alloy in the corrosive environment during osteoblast culture. Another advantage of NPTNTZO(c) is its nanoporous morphology 34 , which is biomimetic with the extracellular matrix of bone tissue, which is mainly composed of nanoporous minerals 35 , 36 . Furthermore, the NPTNTZO(c) layer can also act as a reservoir to accommodate silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), providing an improved antibacterial capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%