2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient flow calibration method for accurate estimation of baseflow using a watershed scale hydrological model (SWAT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ALPHA_BF and CN2, ranked first and second in sensitivity, respectively, and higher than the others which appeared to have made the most contribution in improving the ENS. In general, CN2, ALPHA_BF, SOL_AWC, and RCHRG_DP were important parameters for both baseflow and streamflow simulation, as the water traveling from the root zone in SWAT to deep aquifers was not redistributed into the main channel, soil, or shallow aquifers, but considered lost from the system boundary [76]. The high ALPHA_BF constant in the LEC watershed indicated a rapid response to groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ALPHA_BF and CN2, ranked first and second in sensitivity, respectively, and higher than the others which appeared to have made the most contribution in improving the ENS. In general, CN2, ALPHA_BF, SOL_AWC, and RCHRG_DP were important parameters for both baseflow and streamflow simulation, as the water traveling from the root zone in SWAT to deep aquifers was not redistributed into the main channel, soil, or shallow aquifers, but considered lost from the system boundary [76]. The high ALPHA_BF constant in the LEC watershed indicated a rapid response to groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ALPHA_BF and CN2, ranked first and second in sensitivity, respectively, and higher than the others which appeared to have made the most contribution in improving the ENS. In general, CN2, ALPHA_BF, SOL_AWC, and RCHRG_DP were important parameters for both baseflow and streamflow simulation, as the water traveling from the root zone in SWAT to deep aquifers was not redistributed into the main channel, soil, or shallow aquifers, but considered lost from the system boundary [69]. The high ALPHA_BF constant in the LEC watershed indicated a rapid response to groundwater recharge.…”
Section: Parameter Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWAT is used to predict the impact of management practices, land use and land cover change, and climate change on hydrology and water quality at a watershed scale [22]. Weather, soil properties, topography, and land management practices are the main inputs for simulating hydrologic and water quality processes in a watershed [23]. The model divides a watershed into a number of sub-watersheds according to the threshold values; the sub-watersheds are further divided into main channels and hydrologic response units (HRUs), a unique combination of land use, soil, and slope classes within each sub watershed.…”
Section: Overview Of Swatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee the objectivity of the calibration, the SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP) [27] was used instead of manual calibration. SWAT-CUP is one of the most popular auto-calibration programs as it can produce parameter estimation by uncertainty analysis and simultaneously reduce labor on the part of the user [23,27,28]. SWAT-CUP provides five calibration procedures for the SWAT calibration: Sequential Uncertainty Fitting algorithm version 2 (SUFI-2), Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), Parameter Solution (ParaSol), Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).…”
Section: Model Calibration and Its Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation