2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient incorporation of channel cross-section geometry uncertainty into regional and global scale flood inundation models

Abstract: Efficient incorporation of channel cross-section geometry uncertainty into regional and global scale flood inundation models, Journal of Hydrology (2015), doi: http://dx. AbstractThis paper investigates the challenge of representing structural differences in river channel crosssection geometry for regional to global scale river hydraulic models and the effect this can have on simulations of wave dynamics. Classically, channel geometry is defined using data, yet at larger scales the necessary information and mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is logical therefore to see changes in r producing a marked change in flood extent. Channel roughness changes by contrast have an impact more on flow velocities, consequently impacting on the timing of flood wave propagation through the channel (as discussed in Neal et al, 2015). This would have a more spatially diffuse impact on flood extent that is barely perceptible here.…”
Section: Csi Scoresmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is logical therefore to see changes in r producing a marked change in flood extent. Channel roughness changes by contrast have an impact more on flow velocities, consequently impacting on the timing of flood wave propagation through the channel (as discussed in Neal et al, 2015). This would have a more spatially diffuse impact on flood extent that is barely perceptible here.…”
Section: Csi Scoresmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, for some rivers, it might be impossible to model the observed discharge-water-level relationships with such simplistic cross sections. The approach can be adapted for a slightly more complex representation of cross-section geometry, as for example suggested by Neal et al (2015).…”
Section: Cross-section Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for different subregions of the basin, channel cross-sectional dimensions derived from the same formulae and parameters contained biases of various magnitudes. Hydrologic modeling results were demonstrated to be sensitive to channel cross-sectional dimensions and shapes (Getirana et al, 2013;Neal et al, 2015;Paiva et al, 2013a;Yamazaki et al, 2011), so improving the representation of channel morphology could be important. In this study, the basin-wide parameters for the channel geometry formulae were refined for various subregions of the Amazon Basin based on local channel morphology information to better represent the spatial variability in channel morphology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%