2016
DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.8703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eksplorasi Gaya Respons Ekstrem dalam Mengisi Kuesioner

Abstract: This study aimed to apply the mixture Rasch Model Analysis techniques to identify the proportion of students who possess extreme response styles when completing the questionnaire. Total 2.981 high school students from 30 cities in 15 provinces were instructed to complete questionnaires measuring self-esteem. Self-Self-Esteem Scale consists of four self-reported sub-scales using Likert's model. Analysis suggest that based on how to respond to the scale, student in this study was grouped into three classes: extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are individuals who feel their responses are covered by only two answer choices ("Yes" and "No"), however there are also those who feel it easier to answer when their choices have graduated options. Different preferences regarding the number of responses can produce structural differences which lower the quality of the information obtained from the completion of the instrument, in a survey (Widhiarso, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are individuals who feel their responses are covered by only two answer choices ("Yes" and "No"), however there are also those who feel it easier to answer when their choices have graduated options. Different preferences regarding the number of responses can produce structural differences which lower the quality of the information obtained from the completion of the instrument, in a survey (Widhiarso, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ada individu yang merasa responnya terwadahi dengan hanya dua pilihan jawaban ("Ya" dan "Tidak"), namun ada juga individu yang merasa lebih mudah merespon jika pilihannya dengan opsi berjenjang. Preferensi berbeda terhadap jumlah respon seperti itu dapat menghasilkan perbedaan struktural yang menurunkan kualitas informasi yang diperoleh VERSI BAHASA INDONESIA PUBLIKASI DWIBAHASA dari pengisian instrumen dalam suatu survei (Widhiarso, 2016). Hipotesis terakhir studi ini tentang tingkat variasi respon berdasarkan karakteristik partisipan terbukti efektif.…”
Section: Diskusiunclassified
“…Descriptive analysis of the sample is tabulated, and weighted based on a semantic differential scale to measure the attitude of logical argumentation statements to the assessment of housing landscape patterns in adapting to climate. The statements concluded are given a number scale from 1 (one) to 5 (five) arranged in a continuum line as a range of answers from negative (not adapt) to positive (very climate-responsive) [10] ļ‚· Plenty of open space around the residential landscape helps cross-ventilation into the building and convective heat dissipation of the building; ļ‚· the clustering pattern is very good for each house to get optimal airflow; ļ‚· linear pattern is better than grid pattern; ļ‚· the house's North-South orientation allows for plenty of openings and ventilation on this side; ļ‚· ventilation that works better than glass-covered vents for cross-ventilation to occur; ļ‚· a gable roof with air holes will remove moisture from the space below, while a shield roof accumulates heat in the building [11 and [12]; ļ‚· smooth texture reflects heat, while coarse texture absorbs heat…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability test was done using Interclass Coefficient Correlation (ICC). ICC analysis was done using Software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and the interpretation table of the guideline value table [17,18]. The equation used is as follows: The research method conceived in achieving the objectives can be seen in the flowchart of figure 1 below.…”
Section: š‘‰ = āˆ‘ š‘† [š‘›(š‘āˆ’1)]mentioning
confidence: 99%