2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19071526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Nose-Based Technique for Rapid Detection and Recognition of Moldy Apples

Abstract: In this study, the PEN3 electronic nose was used to detect and recognize fresh and moldy apples inoculated with Penicillium expansum and Aspergillus niger, taking Golden Delicious apples as the model subject. Firstly, the apples were divided into two groups: individual apple inoculated only with/without different molds (Group A) and mixed apples of inoculated apples with fresh apples (Group B). Then, the characteristic gas sensors of the PEN3 electronic nose that were most closely correlated with the flavor in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers usually study fruit hardness, sugar degree, decay, freshness and infectious diseases of bananas [7], oranges [8], cherries [9] and apples [10]- [13] by the electronic nose. The studies prove that the applicability of electronic nose to apple quality detection, while most scholars have focused the studies on apples artificially [14] infected with pathogenic bacteria without giving much attention to naturally deteriorated apples in cold storage. Electronic noses can be classified into two types: the first type is universal electronic noses, which are mainly costly PEN3 [15], [16]; the second type is customized, special-purpose electronic nose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Researchers usually study fruit hardness, sugar degree, decay, freshness and infectious diseases of bananas [7], oranges [8], cherries [9] and apples [10]- [13] by the electronic nose. The studies prove that the applicability of electronic nose to apple quality detection, while most scholars have focused the studies on apples artificially [14] infected with pathogenic bacteria without giving much attention to naturally deteriorated apples in cold storage. Electronic noses can be classified into two types: the first type is universal electronic noses, which are mainly costly PEN3 [15], [16]; the second type is customized, special-purpose electronic nose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In one of the recent studies, a portable commercial PEN3 E-nose was used to detect and recognize moldy ( Penicillium expansum , Aspergillus niger ) “Golden Delicious” apples. The data corresponding to the most correlating sensors were processed by LDA, BPNN, SVM, and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), where the best results were obtained with BPNN and the prediction accuracies varied between 72% and 96.3% [ 199 ]. Additionally, the portable commercial PEN3 was employed to monitor total soluble solid (TSS) and titratable acidity (TA) of litchi fruit exposed to varying degrees of mechanical damage (intact, mild, severe) and different storage conditions (room and cold temperature).…”
Section: Electronic Nose: Historical Background and Food Quality Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNNs are also very useful for plant disease identification, which is done via convolutional neural networks (CNN), which is a specific DNN-architecture used for image recognition (Boulent et al, 2019). Mycotoxins are mainly detected via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry; however, DNNs coupled with rapid analytical tools, such as the electronic nose or infrared attenuated total reflection spectroscopy, have been recently applied and found to improve the assessment reliability (Evans et al, 2000;Jia et al, 2019;Öner et al, 2019;Camardo Leggieri et al, 2020b). Torelli et al (2012), in the first example of ML applied to mycotoxins, performed a 2-year study (2007)(2008) that included seven cropping system variables-FAO class, sowing and harvest dates, crop duration, kernel moisture, ECB treatment, and irrigation-as input for an ANN to classify maize samples based on their contamination with FBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%