2019
DOI: 10.1515/soprag-2019-0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“En serio, de verdad, os lo juro”. El uso de los modalizadores epistémicos con función intensificadora en el monólogo humorístico subversivo

Abstract: ResumenEl presente trabajo tiene por objeto el análisis de partículas intensificadoras en el discurso humorístico planificado. Partimos de la hipótesis de que el uso de expresiones que intensifican la verdad de lo dicho, como en serio, de verdad o lo juro, es una de las estrategias argumentativas que emplean las cómicas españolas para que su discurso resulte más verosímil. En aras de verificar dicha conjetura, esta investigación recoge un corpus de 15 monólogos humorísticos en español, representados por cómica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, as a second general hypothesis, we expect to demonstrate that even though the main aim of humor is to make us laugh, performances with subversive humor can also function as a coping tool, which humorists may use to create an alternative perspective and even to alter normative power structures (Russell 2002: 8;Willis 2005). Finally, in our third hypothesis, we predict that there could be different degrees of subversive humor because of contextual constraints (Yus 2016;Linares-Bernabéu 2019). In this sense, it is worth pointing out that humorwhether by subversion or reinforcement-is highly context dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Additionally, as a second general hypothesis, we expect to demonstrate that even though the main aim of humor is to make us laugh, performances with subversive humor can also function as a coping tool, which humorists may use to create an alternative perspective and even to alter normative power structures (Russell 2002: 8;Willis 2005). Finally, in our third hypothesis, we predict that there could be different degrees of subversive humor because of contextual constraints (Yus 2016;Linares-Bernabéu 2019). In this sense, it is worth pointing out that humorwhether by subversion or reinforcement-is highly context dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%