2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and resolution calibration of NaI(Tl) and LaBr3(Ce) scintillators and validation of an EGS5 Monte Carlo user code for efficiency calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the results of this study are compared with those belonging to other workers (Casanovas et al, 2012;Hamzawy, 2014;Rehman et al, 2009), the observed differences between the values of this work and others' due to the parameters such as detector and the source dimensions, geometric arrangement of the detector and source, etc., that are effective on detector efficiency as mentioned in Introduction section.…”
Section: Figure 4 Energy Resolution Of the Nai(tl) Detector For Sevementioning
confidence: 61%
“…When the results of this study are compared with those belonging to other workers (Casanovas et al, 2012;Hamzawy, 2014;Rehman et al, 2009), the observed differences between the values of this work and others' due to the parameters such as detector and the source dimensions, geometric arrangement of the detector and source, etc., that are effective on detector efficiency as mentioned in Introduction section.…”
Section: Figure 4 Energy Resolution Of the Nai(tl) Detector For Sevementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Somehow, the gamma-rays spectra obtained in the simulations are very different from the spectra obtained with the detectors. Thus, the resolution calibration in the user code must be accounted for obtaining the realistic spectra [17]. As we know, the absolute efficiency of detector is dependent on the source-detector distance.…”
Section: Validation Of Monte Carlo Model: Efficiency Calculations Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It typically depends primarily on the detector material, the energy of the γ-ray, and the physical thickness of the detector in the direction of the incident gamma rays [16][17][18][19][20]. During the calculation of efficiency, the net full-energy peak area is obtained using the total peak area method [21,22].…”
Section: Efficiency Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%