Enterprise knowledge development: the process view

Rolland, Colette; Nurcan, Selmin; Grosz, Georges

doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(99)00016-6

Cited by 34 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…a non-deterministic process. Accordingly, process guidance should allow selecting dynamically the next task to be performed depending on the situation at hand [19], [45], [46], [52], [53], [54].…”

Section: Ekd-change Management Method: Intention Based Modeling Omentioning

confidence: 99%

A multi-method for defining the organizational change

Nurcan

Rolland

2003

Information and Software Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The assumption of the work presented in this paper is the situatedness of the change process. The Enterprise Knowledge Development -Change Management Method (EKD-CMM) provides multiple and dynamically constructed ways of working to organize and to guide the change management. The method is built on the notion of labeled graph of intentions and strategies called a road map and the associated guidelines. The EKD-CMM road map is a navigational structure that supports the dynamic selection of the intention to be achieved next andthe appropriate strategy to achieve it whereas guidelines help in the operationalization of the selected intention following the selected strategy. This paper presents the EKD-CMM road map and guidelines and exemplifies their use with a real case study.

show abstract

Section: Ekd-change Management Method: Intention Based Modeling Omentioning

confidence: 99%

A multi-method for defining the organizational change

Nurcan

Rolland

2003

Information and Software Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A good pattern defines best practice that can be re-used in many different situations. So, patterns have been described for a number of different domains, for example in education 3 [2], organization 4,5 , or management 6 [10]. The related paper [11] presents a method for defining patterns and pattern evaluation criteria.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The safety engineer assesses the V&V Log for safety requirements violation (caused by the injected faulty/dysfunctional behavior). 10 http://open-services.net/ Fig. 3 Workflow of AT-pattern "Support Safety Analysis by Fault Simulation" (circled numbers refer to activities explained in pattern description) 4.…”

Section: B Support Safety Analysis By Fault Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expressing Best Practices in (Risk) Analysis and Testing of Safety-Critical Systems Using Patterns

Herzner

Sieverding

Kacimi

et al. 2014

2014 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The continuing pervasion of our society with safety-critical cyber-physical systems not only demands for adequate (risk) analysis, testing and verification techniques, it also generates growing experience on their use, which can be considered as important as the tools themselves for their efficient use. This paper introduces workflow patterns to describe such best practices in a systematic way that efficiently represents this knowledge, and also provides a way to relate different patterns, making them easier to identify and use, and cover as wide a range of experiences as possible. The value of the approach is demonstrated using some pattern examples from a collection developed in the Artemis-project MBAT 1 . Finally, the paper presents a wiki-based approach for developing and maintaining the pattern collection.

show abstract

“…Enterprise models are built from modeling concepts [3, p. 251], defined in modeling languages, which constitute abstractions of organizational aspects (organizational action systems) and information systems (IS) [1, p. 942]. Examples of enterprise modeling methods include ArchiMate [4], Architecture of Integrated Information Systems (ARIS) [5], Business Engineering (BE) [6], Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations (DEMO) [7,8], For Enterprise Modeling Method (4EM; formerly Enterprise Knowledge Development) [9,10], Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modeling (MEMO) [1,11,12], Semantic Object Model (SOM) [13], The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) [14], and Work System Theory (WST) [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Analysis of Selected Enterprise Modeling Approaches

Böck

Kaczmarek

Overbeek

et al. 2014

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Complexity inherent to the management of organizational action recommends the use of instruments that support the structured description and analysis of organizations. A variety of enterprise modeling (EM) methods have been developed to serve these purposes. To contribute to the elucidation of their conceptual differences, overlaps, and focal points, this paper analyzes four selected EM methods based on a designed analysis framework. It includes an assessment of the methods' key goals and purposes, central assumptions, and concepts. The paper concludes with a suggestion of future research topics.

show abstract

Enterprise knowledge development: the process view

Cited by 34 publications

References 39 publications

A multi-method for defining the organizational change

A multi-method for defining the organizational change

Expressing Best Practices in (Risk) Analysis and Testing of Safety-Critical Systems Using Patterns

A Comparative Analysis of Selected Enterprise Modeling Approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About