1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-328x(77)80135-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme Activities and Products of CO2 Fixation in Various Photosynthetic Organs of Wheat and Oat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
3

Year Published

1981
1981
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A lower RuBP-carboxylase: PEP-carboxylase ratio has, however, been reported in podwall of chickpea (9,15). These results suggest that in podwall of 'Toria' the primary carboxylation reaction assimilating CO2 is catalyzed by RuBP-carboxylase and not by PEP-carboxylase as is the case in fruiting structure of cereals (14,19) and legumes (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lower RuBP-carboxylase: PEP-carboxylase ratio has, however, been reported in podwall of chickpea (9,15). These results suggest that in podwall of 'Toria' the primary carboxylation reaction assimilating CO2 is catalyzed by RuBP-carboxylase and not by PEP-carboxylase as is the case in fruiting structure of cereals (14,19) and legumes (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Although photosynthetic characteristics of fruiting structures of wheat (14,19) barley (12), oat (19), chickpea (15), and pigeonpea (11) have been investigated in detail, no similar report is yet available on the photosynthetic characteristics of fruiting structures of oilseed crops. In our earlier studies with wheat (14) chickpea (15), and pigeonpea (11), we reported high activities of PEP2-carboxylase and other enzymes of C4 metabolism in fruiting structures, suggesting that the primary assimilation of CO2 in these parts occurs via PEP carboxylase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, Hubick and Farquhar (7) reported in barley less carbon isotope discrimination in dry matter of heads than of leaves. This variation in b'3C along plant parts may be caused by differences in the ratio of assimilation rate to CO2 diffusive conductance (5), although variations in the photosynthetic metabolism of the plant parts may also be involved (2,15,16). With regard to the former possibility, although the CO2 conductance is basically stomatal in the leaf, stomatal conductance is probably much less important in awns and even more in ear bracts (1).…”
Section: Differences In 613c Among Plant Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PPDK activity of C3 leaves is only 1 to 5% of that found in C4 maize leaves so that detection by the activity assay can be difficult (19,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%