Evaluating Export Subsidy Programs

Haley, Stephen L.; Riley, Peter A.; Ackerman, Karen Z.; Smith, Mark E.

doi:10.1300/j047v04n01_01

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…NOTES 1 Results from the Producer Payment Panel indicated that barley production would be reduced by 19.2% as a result of these policy changes. Haley et al (1992) evaluate the effects of the EEP on U.S. and competitor barley export volumes and prices. The monopoly status of CWB in barley was removed for six weeks in 1993, and CWB control over barley exports was restored as a result of court challenges.…”

Section: -54mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The implications of EEP on feed barley is discussed more often than on malt. Haley et al (1992) evaluate the effects of the EEP on U.S. and competitor barley export volumes and prices. They conclude that the EEP increased the value of feed barley in the United States relative to its competitors.…”

Section: -54mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Haley, Riley, Ackerman and Smith (1992), Crowder and Glauber (1990) and Seitzinger and Paarlberg (1988, 1989 examine the effects of EEP on barley, soybeans, and wheat, respectively. Haley, Riley, Ackerman and Smith (1992), Crowder and Glauber (1990) and Seitzinger and Paarlberg (1988, 1989 examine the effects of EEP on barley, soybeans, and wheat, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies focus on developments in this sector. Haley, Riley, Ackerman and Smith (1992), Crowder and Glauber (1990) and Seitzinger and Paarlberg (1988, 1989 examine the effects of EEP on barley, soybeans, and wheat, respectively. Bojduniak and Sturgess (1995, 91-93) discuss policy issues relating to production of malting barley in the EU.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Impacts of Trade and Agricultural Policies on the World Malt and Malting Barley Market

Satyanarayana

Wilson

Johnson

et al. 1998

Canadian J Agri Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Major changes have been occurring in agricultural policies affecting world malt and malting barley production and trade. This paper analyzes effects of these changes on international trade and competition. A spatially disaggregated linear programing model of the world malt and malting barley sector is constructed and used to analyze effects of changes in European Union supply, European Union restitutions, the U.S. Export Enhancement Program subsidy regime, and import tariffs on malt and malting barley. Policy changes are found to generate substantial changes in trade flows and competitiveness between producing and exporting regions. De grands bouleversements secouent les politiques agricoles ressortissant à la production et aux échanges de malt et d'orge brassicole à l'échelle mondiale. Nous analysons ici les effets de ces changements sur les échanges et sur la concurrence internationaux. Au moyen d'un modèle de programmation linéaire, désagrégé dans l'espace, nous étudions les effets des changements sur la situation de l'approvisionnement et sur les restitutions à l'exportation dans l'UnionEuropéene, ainsi que sur le régime de subventions à l'exportation (US) et sur les tarifs douaniers à l'importation visant la consommation du malt et de l'orge brassicole. Nous avons constaté que les grands changements stratégiques modifiaient substantiellement les courants d'échange ainsi que la concurrentialité entre les régions de production et les régions d'exportation.

show abstract

Section: -54mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: -54mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Impacts of Trade and Agricultural Policies on the World Malt and Malting Barley Market

Satyanarayana

Wilson

Johnson

et al. 1998

Canadian J Agri Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These practices no longer apply in the current freer trading environment. 12 The magnitude of this influence has been disputed (Haley et al 1992;Carter 1993a,b). The data reported by Schmitz et al (1997) and the results of a recent study by Maki et al (1997) indicate that such an influence may tend to be much smaller than was suggested by Haley et al This situation of the U.S. market does provide a rather limited instance in which it is clear that the introduction of a multiple-seller market structure could eliminate such premiums, presuming the absence of trade actions by the United States in response to increased levels of imports associated with arbitrage.…”

Section: Factors Influencing the Future Marketing Of Western Canadianmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Will Market Western Canada's Grain?

Veeman

1998

Canadian J Agri Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Invited Paper In this review paper, the intense current debate on the appropriate role of the Canadian Wheat Board in the domestic and export marketing of prairie wheat and barley is overviewed. The role, functions and powers of the board, a legislatively specified marketing institution, have changed over time. Numbers of broad socio‐economic influences are affecting the environment in which this body operates and are likely to affect the marketing of prairie grains in the future. These include changes in communication technology, the increasing integration of national economies across international boundaries and associated pressures for decreased protection and less market regulation for agriculture, among other sectors. These forces tend to favor continuation of the gradual deregulation of the market structure for prairie grains, a process that has been occurring in Canada since feedgrain marketing policy changes were instituted in the mid‐1970s. Recent studies of the performance of the statutory grain marketing system involve economic arguments, use quite different assumptions and consequently arrive at conflicting conclusions. Despite the focus on economic arguments, political influences and social attitudes have considerably influenced the institution and development of the board. Both economic and political forces will continue to have a major impact on the extent and timing of future deregulation of Canadian grain marketing.

show abstract

The Canadian Wheat Board and feed barley

Schmitz

Gray

2000

Agribusiness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present arguments that the Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Foundation in the United States has no basis for filing a countervail complaint against the Canadian cattle industry in which it alleges that Canadian cattle are being fed cheap barley because of alleged inefficiencies of the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB). If there are inefficiencies in the Canadian grain marketing system, many are not attributable to the CWB. For example, elevation charges are set by grain companies, and not by the CWB. Furthermore, when the Export Enhancement Program (EEP) and other factors are taken into account, barley prices are not lower of Lethbridge, Alberta (a major cattle feeding region in Canada) than they are in comparable areas in the United States. In addition, with the removal of the Crow transportation subsidy there has been a dramatic change in the export and domestic pricing relationship for barley.

show abstract

Evaluating Export Subsidy Programs

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Impacts of Trade and Agricultural Policies on the World Malt and Malting Barley Market

Impacts of Trade and Agricultural Policies on the World Malt and Malting Barley Market

Who Will Market Western Canada's Grain?

The Canadian Wheat Board and feed barley

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About