Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Field- Programmable Technology (IEEE Cat. No.04EX921)
DOI: 10.1109/fpt.2004.1393284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating software and hardware implementations of signal-processing tasks in an FPGA

Abstract: Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filtering and LeastMean Squares (LMSI adaptive filtering algorithms have been implemented in both hardware and sofnvare on a MicroblaEe processor configured in a Virrer II, runnirig aClinxr. These implementarions have been ewluared in terms of currenr usage (both idle and active). area usage (for hardware-assisted implemenrarions), latency and CPU urilisarion. Partitioning of the MS algorithm was initially performed in U simple way, highlighring rhe shortcomings of obvious partiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, for FPGAs, only the power consumption of certain matrix multiplication algorithms have been presented in [1] and of various digital signal processing modules in [2]. Moreover, Lysecky and Vahid [3] have studied the differences between the performance achieved when certain tasks are executed in the embedded processing cores of a state-of-the-art-FPGA and when their are executed by dedicated hardware modules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, for FPGAs, only the power consumption of certain matrix multiplication algorithms have been presented in [1] and of various digital signal processing modules in [2]. Moreover, Lysecky and Vahid [3] have studied the differences between the performance achieved when certain tasks are executed in the embedded processing cores of a state-of-the-art-FPGA and when their are executed by dedicated hardware modules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are usually two ways to implement the LMS algorithm, hardware implementation and software implementation [8], [9]. The hardware implementation of the algorithm in an FPGA has good real-time ability, but requires large resources.…”
Section: Fig2flowchart Of the Lms Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardware power measurements of large FPGAs has received little attention compared to that of standard cell ASIC, which has been extensively studied in the literature. In particular, only the power consumption when certain matrix multiplication algorithms are implemented in hardware have been presented in [27] and of various digital signal processing modules in [28]. Moreover, Lysecky and Vahid [29] have studied the differences between the performance achieved when certain tasks are executed in the embedded processing cores of a state-of-the-art-FPGA and when their are executed by dedicated hardware modules.…”
Section: Power Measurements On Fpgasmentioning
confidence: 99%